Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
A climate battle is quietly raging in homes across America. Cities are increasingly adopting and implementing policies to reduce carbon emissions at every level, despite opposition from Washington’s biggest construction and fossil fuel trade associations. The International Code Council, which, despite its name, serves primarily the U.S., met this week to evaluate about two dozen proposals that, if implemented, could require new homes to be built with features that would ease a transition to net-zero living.
Potential features include outlets near stoves so that residents could opt to switch to electric stoves in the future, and increased power supply to garages, to give occupants a way to charge an electric car.
Why This Matters: Buildings and their construction comprise about36% of global energy use and 39% of energy-related carbon emissions annually. About 40% of all energy consumption in the U.S. comes from residential and commercial buildings. Reducing these emissions at scale is the low-hanging fruit that helps us achieve our emissions reductions goals.
The Paris Climate Agreement, which the U.S. officially leaves the day after the 2020 Presidential election, specifies that to limit the increase of earth’s average temperature, the energy use of built infrastructure will have to be reduced by 30 percent by 2030. Cities and states are key players in ensuring that local codes become updated to support energy efficiency. “There are few things that are more impactful than energy code,” said Stacey Miller, the sustainability program coordinator for Minneapolis, “so we see this as critical.”
Furthermore, the federal Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) helps low-income homes across America weatherize and save on energy costs, but it has a yearly maximum capacity of 35,000 and is vastly underfunded. Should Joe Biden be elected this November, expanding WAP to cover more homes could far exceed the already impressive 2 million metric tons of emissions saved annually by the program.
Biden has already made a commitment to increasing building efficiency in his platform, pledging to retrofit 4 million buildings with efficiency improvements in his first term should he be elected. This would go a long way in helping ease the disproportionate energy burden faced by low-income households who already typically spend 20% of their income on energy purchases.
Fighting Dirty: The fossil fuel industry’s opposition to these rules is not new. Despite the new codes, the industry and its trade associations are concerned about the costs of implementing the new policy as well as losing their historical influence over the process for setting building codes, efficiency experts say.
The National Association of Home Builders went so far as to sign a secret deal that guaranteed them 4 out of 11 voting seats on two committees that decide building codes adopted nationwide. This deal granted them immense power; they were able to thwart residential increases in energy efficiency by 29% in only 6 years.
Now, trade organizations are coming out vocally against new climate-friendly codes. The Leading Builders Association argued in a Council meeting that governmental members were “recruited by special interests for the sole purpose of advancing their agenda.”
Craig Drumheller, assistant vice-president of construction codes and standards for the National Association of Homebuilders said in an interview that the Council’s process disregarded their interests and that there were “holes in the process that got taken advantage of, and those holes need to be plugged”.
Madison Neal, a spokeswoman for the council welcomed dialogue and criticism but emphasized that only governmental representatives “who have no financial or business interest in the outcome” can have the final say in the matter.
Miller believes that government officials are the best people to be representing the public. “I feel like we’re the strongest advocates for the public interest,” she said of her and her peers, government officials from San Diego, Boston, Pittsburgh, Columbus, Seattle, Honolulu, Charlotte, Orlando, and more. “That’s our job as government officials – unlike for-profit or trade organizations where there are other motivations.”
Later this evening President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden will convene for the final presidential debate before the general election on November 3rd. While the first debate had an unexpected question on climate change from moderator Chris Wallace, tonight’s moderator NBC News’ Kristen Welker pre-selected climate change as a debate topic outright. […]
by Natasha Lasky, ODP Contributing Writer At a rally in Prescott, AZ, on Monday, President Donald Trump described a theoretical fundraising call he had with the CEO of ExxonMobil, in which he accepted a bribe from the oil giant. Trump said: “I call the head of Exxon. I don’t know, you know, ‘How are you […]
During his 2016 presidential campaign, then-candidate Trump promised to reopen coal mines and expressed to coal communities that he was their last shot at reviving the ailing industry. After the media drastically twisted Hillary Clinton’s comments about a just transition for coal miners, Trump was able to paint himself as a savior for struggling rural […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.