Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
In the past week, there has been a deluge of stories in various newspapers about how cities and rural areas are dealing with flooding related to climate change-linked sea-level rise or extreme rain events or both. Two clear storylines emerge: some places such as areas in the Florida Keys or even the precious relics of Venice may not able to be saved and we need to face up to it, and there cities like Houston and Charlotte that are beginning to deal with habitual flooding by preparing for it or even moving people out of its path.
Why This Matters: Climate change-related flooding needs to be near the top of the list of things we MUST do to deal with the climate crisis. This is a problem not just for tomorrow, but indeed right now. These issues may, in fact, be related to the public’s growing awareness of the reality of climate change and its desire to have the government do more to address it.Some cities are more aggressively working on adaptation than others — like Houston — whose local news is often about various efforts across the city to deal with their habitual flooding. But if their efforts are focused on building expensive sea walls, are they doing the right thing? Venice has spent almost two decades on a massive sea walls project that still is not completed and which many believe will destroy the surrounding natural environment without providing meaningful protection to the city from sea-level rise. And how long will these expensive “band-aids” or even “tourniquets” work?
Houston Knows It Has A Flooding Problem
Houston is awash with flooding projects, but few buyouts. For example, its new Spaceport, which will be a hub for aerospace companies that service the space industry through new developments and technologies, has a huge “detention basin” build around it to capture rainwater running off the mostly hardscaped site, and keeping it from inundating surrounding neighborhoods when storms like Imelda come through. The basin is built to be able to hold twice as much water as is required. And a local high school that has flooded repeatedly is getting $25M from FEMA to construct flood gates and waterproof the building’s brick exterior to fend off future storms, giving peace of mind to students who were displaced from the campus for months after Harvey. That seems like a big number for just one high school’s flood mitigation, but to rebuild the school on higher ground would have cost $260M. Therein lies the problem.
Charlotte Is Ahead of the Curve
Charlotte began moving to higher ground in the 1990s. The Washington Post explains that “the Queen City has also been steadily unbuilding itself, bulldozing houses and razing apartment complexes along its creeks, ripping up a mall parking lot to reveal a hidden waterway and then stripping away its concrete banks, all in a bid to prevent the flash flooding that turns communities into deathtraps.” So far, they have torn down more than 450 structures and replaced them with “absorbent grasslands” — a flood mitigation strategy that is seen as a prototype for other cities. It was seen as “ahead of the curve” when twenty years ago they realized their future flood risk and began to take action purchasing and removing vulnerable homes and businesses.
Yesterday at the annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged to achieve “carbon neutrality before 2060” with the aim of hitting peak emissions before 2030. China had choice words for the Trump administration and its complete lack of international leadership on climate change action. Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang […]
The world’s richest one percent cause more than double the CO2 of the poorest 50% according to a new study from Oxfam. From 1990 to 2015, CO2 emissions rose by 60%; experts saw the wealthiest one percent’s emissions rise three times more than those of the poorest half during that period.
Why this matters: While the wealthiest indulge in luxuries that contribute more to climate change, a federal report found that the poor will be among the earliest victims of climate crises and will be impacted the most.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.