Australia’s Burned Forests Pose Immense Economic Risk

The silhouette of a firefighter is seen in front of a large bushfire burning high into trees.

Image: Gena Dray

Australia’s wildfires have been devastating for wildlife and people alike but there’s another casualty that’s been largely overlooked in media coverage: its forests. Australia is home to 457 individual forest areas, which together cover a total area of approximately 123 million hectares and the ongoing fires have caused serious losses.

In fact, the Australian Forest Products Association (AFPA) says the wildfires burning large swaths of the country’s forests will cause significant job losses and long-term economic damage. It’s calling for a national consensus to replant and better protect Australia’s forest “infrastructure.”

What’s Going On: Inside Climate News explained that this is about more than forests burning, persistent wildfires are changing entire forest ecosystems in their wake:

“More than 17 million acres have burned in Australia over the last three months amid record heat that has dried vegetation and pulled moisture from the land. Hundreds of millions of animals, including a large number of koalas, are believed to have perished in the infernos. The survivors will face drastically changed habitats. Water flows and vegetation will change, and carbon emissions will rise as burning trees release carbon and fewer living trees are left to pull CO2 out of the air and store it.

In many ways, it’s the definition of a tipping point, as ecosystems transform from one type into another.”

It Gets Worse… As Nerilie Abram, a climate researcher at Australian National University, explained, increasing temperatures dry out fuel and lead to more days of extreme fire weather. The poleward shift of the Southern Hemisphere westerly winds is drawing winter rainfall away from southern Australia, causing a long-term drying trend that makes the landscape more vulnerable to burning.

What’s Next: Active brushfires raging across Australia are expected to burn for weeks, but the AFPA explained that a deeper disaster could extend years into the future if steps aren’t taken to replenish lost forest plantations and make protecting and managing them a national priority. They recommend the following steps to slow the economic and ecological losses resulting from the fires:

  1. As many plantation trees as possible must be saved by nationally supported fire-fighting assets supplementing those resources owned by the plantation companies and state forest agencies;
  2. A massive salvage operation must be supported to enable damaged, but still usable, trees to be stockpiled;
  3. Plantations must be considered an infrastructure asset and urgent replanting supported under the federal Government’s $2billion reconstruction fund or other mechanisms, and
  4. The one billion trees program must be fast-tracked – not delayed

Why This Matters: Before the fires sparked, Australia was in the midst of a full-blown land-clearing crisis with estimates suggesting that in the two decades to 2030, 3m hectares of untouched forest could be bulldozed in eastern Australia. Abating climate change while properly managing forests should be a major political priority for Australia’s government–though PM Morrison doesn’t seem to agree.

Go Deeper: In talking about reforestation, science is increasingly telling us that planting the right trees is critical to protecting forest biodiversity and maximizing carbon sequestration.

Up Next

The President’s and Republicans’ Climate Plans Are All About Trees

The President’s and Republicans’ Climate Plans Are All About Trees

Yesterday, President Trump announced at Davos that the U.S. will join the “Trillion Tree Initiative” that is being promoted there as a way for world leaders to commit to combatting climate change.  The President said yesterday that, “We’re committed to conserving the majesty of God’s creation and the natural beauty of our world.”

Why This Matters:  Chanelling our inner Lorax here – the Republicans MAY have brought the President along on planting trees — but it would be really great if they could get him to stop cutting them down.

Continue Reading 537 words
Top Stories of 2019: Forests on Fire All Over the World

Top Stories of 2019: Forests on Fire All Over the World

This year will be remembered for searing images of the Amazon burning at an unprecedented rate (there were so many fires you could see them from space), with Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro alternating between downplaying the severity of them and then sending in Brazilian military troops to fight the tens of thousands of fires burning thereAs we reported, world leaders and environmental organizations — even the Pope — pushed Brazil to take action — and the worst part was most of the fires were started by people who wanted to clear land for agriculture and other development.  But fires were bad all over the planet — from the Arctic tundra in Greenland, Alaska, and Siberia, to Australia, and of course, California.

Continue Reading 511 words
CA’s Forest Management Woes

CA’s Forest Management Woes


As California begins to grapple with wildfire management it must also contend with what to do about its forests. From a legal battle playing out about whether the U.S. Forest Service should be able to cut down burned trees to how non-native eucalyptus forests should be managed, not everyone can agree on the best means of forest management.

Continue Reading 469 words