Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
The Phillips 66 refinery in Rodeo. Image: Craig Miller/KQED
The State of California’s 7-year-old cap and trade system is an important component of how the state plans to achieve its ambitious climate goals: to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. As C2ES explained, California’s emissions trading program is the fourth largest in the world, following the cap-and-trade programs of China, the European Union, and the Republic of Korea and has provided valuable insights into creating and managing an economy-wide cap-and-trade system for many other national and subnational governments.
But as a result of COVID-19, demand for fossil fuels has decreased across and California’s and its latest quarterly cap-and-trade auction generated very little money for the state to spend on key environmental programs.
Now, in a letter obtained by CalMatters, California EPA Secretary Jared Blumenfeld laid out plans for re-examining the program and whether it’s likely to meet its goals.
Why This Matters: In California’s cap and trade system, polluters had accrued enough surplus allowances to depress the price of carbon credits being auctioned off. And as ProPublica explained, while the state’s program has helped it meet some initial, easily attained benchmarks, experts are increasingly worried that it is allowing California’s biggest polluters to conduct business as usual and even increase their emissions. Using this time to reevaluate the mechanics of the cap and trade program could be a necessary step.
Good or Bad?: Energy experts have differing opinions on how effective of a tool California’s cap and trade system is at reducing emissions while also funding state environmental programs. Katelyn Roedner Sutter, U.S. climate program manager for the Environmental Defense Fund explained that the latest weak auction illustrates the “need to diversify funding for complementary climate investments.” As Sutter told KQED, “Rather than relying solely on a program specifically designed to reduce emissions and lower mitigation costs (and therefore revenue), California should move toward ensuring climate priorities are a core part of the state’s long-term fiscal priorities.”
The Plan to Reevaluate: CalMatters explained that Blumenfeld wrote in his letter that the review of the cap and trade program must clarify how much California can rely on it. The state’s latest climate roadmap “designates cap-and-trade as responsible for almost half of the reductions required to achieve California’s 2030 climate target, making it the single largest driver of planned climate policy outcomes.”
In a little-noticed report that could have major implications for both the Eastern U.S. and Europe, scientists announced last week that Atlantic Ocean currents are thought to be 15% weaker than in 1950. The Washington Post explained, saying that the “system of currents that includes the Florida Current and the Gulf Stream, is now ‘in its weakest state in over a millennium.'”
Why This Matters: We need to understand both these phenomena better to predict climate events. They are quite a coincidence.
“You can’t find a Utahn who doesn’t really care about clean air and clean water.” @RepJohnCurtis said his goal is to find ways “to make them feel more comfortable [politically] talking about it.” @LeeDavi49903322 #climate https://t.co/jVpPBJq0GE — CCL Salt Lake City (@CCLsaltlake) February 19, 2021 By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer Representative John Curtis of […]
Climate change is the biggest threat facing the world, and yesterday’s United Nations Security Council meeting was focused on the topic. United States climate envoy John Kerry, who participated in the virtual meeting, warned that ignoring the crisis and its threats to global security would mean “marching forward to what is almost tantamount to a mutual suicide pact.”
Why this Matters: Global food security, poverty rates, and public health are all negatively impacted by climate change. These destabilizing forces are already driving people to migrate and shifting power balances on the international stage.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.