Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
A new study titled, Flying blind: The glaring absence of climate risks in financial reporting, from Carbon Tracker and the Climate Accounting Project (CAP) showed that 107 global businesses that work in high-emissions fields like oil and gas firms, construction, car manufacturers, and aviation businesses, have not been transparent about their sustainability. Researchers wrote that there was a “glaring absence of climate risks in financial reporting” and that more than 70% of the companies analyzed did not include their climate impact in their financial statements.
Why this Matters: “The fact that we don’t have transparency means we have no idea if capital is being allocated to sustainable activities so we can actually transition to a greener future,” Barbara Davidson, an analyst at Carbon Tracker and lead author of the report, told the BBC.
“There’s a level of disclosure that needs to be provided, so we know how they are going to achieve these targets,” Davidson continued, “It’s very important for companies to set these goals, but without understanding the risks, it’s hard to know if they’re greenwashing — so investors need to take the statements with a pinch of salt.”
In many cases, the report found inconsistencies across reporting, with firms purporting to implement emission targets and climate strategies but not explaining how these targets would affect their financial statements. Moreover, 8 out of 10 audits of these firms also showed no evidence of assessing climate risk.
This lack of data not only hurts the planet, but also creates problems for investors. Tracey Cameron, Senior Manager from Corporate Climate Engagement at Ceres, told the BBC: “Investors grappling with quantifying portfolio risks aren’t given the data needed to make informed decisions. In many cases, that data exists, but it lives behind a locked door, and only companies and auditors have the key.”
That companies are withholding this information isn’t a surprise as they are neither required nor punished for refusing to account for climate risk. But investors could make a difference if they threaten to divest or otherwise disincentivize concealing climate risk data.
By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have hit a three-million-year high, according to a World Meteorological Organization (WMO) report published yesterday. Despite a brief dip in emissions in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the overall trend of increasing emissions continues, indicating last year’s dip had little to no impact on […]
By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer A report in the Dasgupta Review shows that by using a fiscal lens to view Earth’s growing biodiversity loss, we can see how it links to economic development. By viewing nature as an asset like “produced capital (roads, buildings and factories)” or “human capital (health, knowledge and skills)” — […]
By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer While coal use is a leading source of greenhouse gas emissions, another industry is set to outpace it: plastic. A new report from Bennington College and Beyond Plastics estimates the plastic industry emits over 232 million tons of greenhouse gases each year, the equivalent of 116 coal-fired power plants. […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.