Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
The rapidly-spreading coronavirus is thought to have originated in China’s Wuhan Huanan live animal market. As Grace Ge Gabriel, the Regional Director of Asia at the International Fund for Animal Welfare recently wrote in her Bright Ideas op-ed of the market,
“The sign from the store with “wild tastes” in its name reads like a zoo’s exotic animal collection mixed with a butcher shop menu. Live peacocks, porcupines, rats, foxes, crocodiles, wolf cubs, turtles, snakes, frogs, wild pigs…, and meats, feet, blood, intestines and other body parts from all of the above and more. Over one hundred items from over 70 species were on offer. “
Problem Solved?: While this decision is important, it does not ban trade for fur, medicine or research, which experts say is a concerning oversight. As the Wildlife Conservation Society explained,
“There is no such risk-free trade and consumption of any wild mammals and birds whether they are wild-caught or farmed. WCS believes that only by prohibiting thelivetrade in all wild birds and mammals can the risk of future viralemergences be prevented, and thus other forms of trade should also be included in this ban.
In addition, this creates a potential loophole for traffickers who may exploit the non-food exemptions to sell or trade live wildlife, creating additional challenges to law enforcement officers.”
Not all wildlife is traded for food and some species like pangolins have their scales used by the ton in traditional Chinese medicine. As the New York Times explained, the Chinese government controls the trade, but there is still room for illegal activity unless loopholes are closed.
The Challenges: The SCMP broke down the challenges that the Chinese government will face in enforcing these new restrictions. Namely, eating game animals has a long history in China and supports a massive industry that has been encouraged by the state as a source of income for poverty-affected areas.
With limited resources to police the new rules, backers of the ban will have to overcome loopholes in the country’s wildlife protection laws, a lack of law enforcement officers and expertise at the grass-roots level, opposition from vested interest groups, and the centuries-old appetite among Chinese for wild animals both for food and medicinal use.
Why This Matters: As the Guardian noted, for the past few years China’s leadership has pushed the idea that “wildlife domestication” should be a key part of rural development, eco-tourism and poverty alleviation. In fact, just weeks before the coronavirus outbreak, China’s State Forestry and Grassland Administration (SFGA) was still actively encouraging wildlife farming for citizens. If China is able to uphold its ban on wildlife trade and trafficking it could be an important step in conserving biodiversity and protecting vulnerable species. And since SARS is also believed to have originated from wildlife, it’s critical that China stays a global partner in protecting wildlife.
As coronavirus cases are once again surging across the country, it’s evident that our leaders do not have total control of this pandemic. This week, Dr. Anthony Fauci’s issued a dire warning that daily new cases could surpass 100,000 new infections per day if the outbreak continues on its current trend. While some states have […]
In a massive and highly complex legal settlement covering the majority of the claims against Monsanto, a U.S. company that makes the weedkiller Roundup, its parent, Bayer Corporation, will pay nearly $11B to settle approximately 95,000 claims and set aside $1.25 billion for potential claims from Roundup customers who may develop cancer in the future.
Why This Matters: This must end the debate about whether Roundup can still be sold to consumers.
Yesterday, over 36,000 new cases of COVID-19 were reported by state health officials. As the Washington Post explained, the number of cases has surpassed the previous single-day record of 34,203 set on April 25. Increased community spread in states like Florida and Texas–whose governors were eager to reopen–show that warnings from public health officials who […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.