Congress Investigating Whether Coal Companies Bilked Government for Clean Coal Subsidies

Dave Johnson coal-fired power plant, central Wyoming     Photo: Greg Goebel, Wiki CC

The General Accounting Office (aka GAO), which investigates waste, fraud, and abuse claims on behalf of Congress, is examining whether coal companies took advantage of a tax subsidy that was supposed to underwrite their costs in exchange for them emitting less air pollution and greenhouse gasses. It turns out they may never have delivered on their cleaner air promises. Reuters published a Special Report series in December 2018 that revealed that many power plants burning chemically treated coal, which the companies called “clean coal,” were actually emitting even more pollution than when using untreated coal.  Resources for the Future, a non-profit group, later corroborated Reuters — finding that power plants using refined coal were not cutting mercury, nitrogen oxide, and sulfur dioxide pollution to levels required by the tax credit program.

Why This Matters:  President Biden promised to rid the tax code of all the subsidies for fossil fuels.  Subsidies for these pollution sources are bad — but fraudulently claiming them is even worse.  Some big companies took advantage of the tax break, including Fidelity Investments, Goldman Sachs Group Inc, JPMorgan Chase & Co Inc, pharmaceutical giant Mylan NV, and Waste Management Inc, according to Reuters.  Subsidies like this have to go — the abuses would not have been caught but for journalists.  

IRS’ Oversight Was Lax

The Reuters investigation uncovered the fact that the IRS allowed the companies to claim the credit if they tested relatively small amounts of refined coal in a laboratory once a year to show the reduced emissions, instead of requiring actual emissions results data from the source at the power plant.  In 2020, 150 million tons of so-called “refined” coal was burned in the United States, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration for which the claimants received a tax credit of $7.30 for each ton burned.  Companies have used the credit to amass billions in tax write-offs that they can use or save for later years when they have higher profits than say during the pandemic.

The Bad Actors

Reuters’ original investigation identified 56 companies taking advantage of the tax break in 2017 using data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration and disclosures from energy companies and refined-coal developers.  Of those 56 companies, only 18 reduced NOx emissions by more than 20 percent in 2017 compared to 2009. And of those 18, 15 polluted less after they installed pollution control equipment — so the reductions may not have been derived from the supposedly “clean” fuel they were using. On the other hand, 22 of the 56 had higher NOx emissions in 2017 while burning refined coal than they had when they were using raw coal in 2009.

Ron Sahu, an environmental engineer who has consulted with utility companies, the EPA and the U.S. Justice Department on power plant emissions said at the time that the Reuters analysis showed that refined coal was not effective in reducing NOx emissions at actual power plants, which was the point of the tax credit in the first place.  The subsidy program may have been more successful when it came to reducing mercury emissions — where the reduction was 75%, but it may have been attributable to other factors as well.

If more fraud is uncovered it may result in Congress eliminating the subsidy.

Up Next

Interview of the Week: Josh Aviv of Spark Charge

Getting more electric vehicles on the road is a crucial part of lowering greenhouse gas emissions and reducing air pollution. In addition to making EVs more affordable, charging must become more accessible and convenient–especially for people living in “charging deserts.” That’s where the mobile charging company, Spark Charge, comes in. CEO and Founder, Josh Aviv […]

Continue Reading 226 words
Ford and BMW Invest $130 Million in Solid-State EV Battery Development

Ford and BMW Invest $130 Million in Solid-State EV Battery Development

Ford and BMW are leading a $130 million investment in EV battery start-up Solid Power, the companies announced Monday. Solid Power makes solid-state batteries, which don’t use the liquid electrolyte found in the lithium-ion batteries used to power most electric vehicles. 

Why This Matters:  Car companies have long been allies of the fossil fuel industry. Now they are pivoting and expanding into EVs, not only pledging to reduce emissions but to go fully electric in coming decades.

Continue Reading 492 words
Biden Admin Approves Massive Solar Project in CA Desert

Biden Admin Approves Massive Solar Project in CA Desert

by Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer On Monday, the Biden administration announced that it had approved a $550 million solar energy project—named the Crimson Solar Project— with the capacity to power almost 90,000 homes. This project will be built on 2,000 acres of federally owned desert land west of Blythe, California.  This area, halfway between […]

Continue Reading 358 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.