Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
The January 6th insurrection at the Capitol was the culmination of years of disinformation, conspiracy theories, and false narratives pushed by the GOP, the Trump administration, white supremacists, and the far-right — but these tactics are not a surprise to those who work in the climate movement. Indeed, experts like John Schwartz, a science writer for The New York Times, the lies and rhetoric that fueled the riots felt all too familiar.“A big part of our job is dealing with the disinformation that people and institutions spread to muddy the waters about climate change,” he wrote.
Following Twitter’s recent ban of the president (and his subsequent ban from every major social network and streaming platform), false information about the election fraud dropped by 73% in just one week. The drop highlights the very real power social media companies have when it comes to controlling the spread of disinformation, a power they have denied having in the past. This revelation begs the question, should social media companies be doing more to combat disinformation about climate change?
To Fact Check…
Environmental organizations Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Greenpeace released a statement calling on Facebook and other platforms to regulate misinformation about climate change. “Climate deniers are an easy group to define — we gave Facebook the list. Just as Facebook has taken responsibility for its own carbon emissions, it must take responsibility to stop climate deniers from spreading disinformation on its platform,” they said. Michael Khoo, an advisor to Friends of the Earth says he’s scared of what climate change deniers will do with unchecked power. “My greatest fear is that if we have a rare moment to take real action on climate change, they could be the foot soldiers that stop that,” he said. “It’s the scariest thing I’ve ever encountered.”
…Or Not to Fact Check
The Times’ Schwartz isn’t so sure it matters. He noted that after Trump’s ban, White House officials stepped in to continue the spread of disinformation. David Legates, who served as the head of the United States Global Change Research Program, and Ryan Maue, a senior official at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, posted a series of debunked “scientific” reports spurring responses from other climate denialists online. “Efforts to limit disinformation just move the myths around. If history is any guide, it will pop up again elsewhere, virulent as ever,”wrote Schwartz.
by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer UN Climate Change has published the Initial NDC Synthesis Report, which evaluated information from 75 parties to the Paris agreement representing 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions. The results: “governments are nowhere close to the level of ambition needed to limit climate change to 1.5 degrees and meet the […]
Why this Matters: Under the Paris Agreement, nations agreed to prevent the rise in global temperature from reaching two degrees Celsius and keeping the rise under 1.5 degrees celsius, but that won’t be possible if our emissions start going up again.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.