Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
In a well-researched and thorough story, Vox reporter David Roberts explains why Democrats should finally be hopeful that the numerous factions and “green groups” that make up the Democratic coalition are coming into alignment on climate change policy and that this growing sense of unity bodes well not only for the election but also for governing in the event that Democrats retake the White House. The new policy alignment on climate is borne out of the long Presidential primary campaign, in which all the candidates agreed that climate change is an important issue and then proceeded to attempt to outdo one another, and thus now there is a veritable climate smorgasbord of good ideas to choose from. But according to Roberts, the groups have embraced a three-pillar approach of “Standards, Investment, and Justice” and have firmly moved away from market mechanisms like cap and trade and carbon taxes.
Why This Matters: The new myriad of policies may seem small, but when added together they provide a breadth of coverage that is more substantial than the previous structural silver bullets of carbon trading and offsets that were actually quite complicated to legislate, as was learned the hard way in the 2009 Waxman-Markey donnybrook. In a “disaggregated” policy, Roberts reasons, there is something for everyone and climate change policy gets infused across the government not pigeonholed in any one agency, making it much more politically powerful, and resilient in that it can also shed any one piece that becomes a liability.
Read the whole article here. It is worth your time. And FWIW, I (Monica) agree that there is good reason for optimism that Democrats are finally coming together around new progressive climate policies and that climate issues will be front and center in the campaign for the Presidency, and that is HUGE.
Boy, are we blowing it. After the July 4th holiday weekend cases of COVID-19 surged in the United States due to a piecemeal response by governors throughout the country. Last week, the EU banned American travelers, while Canada is fining them and Mexico is working to introduce tighter restrictions on them. It seems as if […]
After the New York Times reported that the proposal would be forthcoming, yesterday, allies of both former Vice President Biden and Senator Bernie Sanders released a joint set of policy recommendations to tackle the climate crisis. The recommendations signal a commitment to cooperation among the progressive wing of the party with the more mainstream base. […]
E&E News led with a story yesterday about the numerous environmental groups who received government support under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) even as they were suing the government over policies they believed the Trump administration got wrong.
Why This Matters: The E&E story seems to imply that environmental groups should not be suing the Trump administration — they sought comments from numerous groups as to they were taking the money while continuing to file lawsuits.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.