Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Why This Matters: The investigations found documents that showed lengths the President, the White House Chief of Staff, the Secretary of Commerce, his then-chief of staff (who is on the verge of becoming the Department’s top lawyer), and NOAA’s acting Administrator went to suppress the truth about the President’s incorrect warnings and continued insistence that he was right about Dorian’s possible path — regardless of the impact on the agency and its forecasters’ credibility. The NOAA statement left agency employees intimidated and demoralized. Dems are right to demand that there will be no political interference with agency forecasts during this hurricane season — the public’s safety must be paramount.
What The Dems Demanded
According to The Hill, the letter to NOAA from Democratic Sens. Ed Markey (Mass.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Mazie Hirono (Hawaii), Ron Wyden (Ore.) and Maggie Hassan (N.H.) “While you dispute the NAPA findings in your response — stating that the tweet and NOAA statement on Hurricane Dorian are ‘not the types of science and research to which the [scientific integrity] policy applies—it remains clear that this incident casts serious doubt over NOAA’s ability to ensure the scientific integrity of its world-class employees.” The Senators went on to say, “NOAA must “determine what steps you will take to implement or even to exceed NAPA’s recommendations in order to establish an ethically sound culture at NOAA that ensures scientific integrity is paramount.”
The Commerce IG Report
The Commerce Department’s Inspector General report on the circumstances surrounding the NOAA statement found that “The Department defended the issuance of the Statement as a necessary correction of the NWS Birmingham office to ensure the scientific accuracy of weather forecasts. But the direct accounts of how and why the Statement was drafted vary significantly. Upon our review of the evidence in its totality—including these varied accounts, and in the light of the stated mission of NWS to “protect life and property”—we found that the NWS Birmingham weather forecasting staff acted properly on September 1 in tweeting a public safety message to inform the public and emergency management partners that Alabama would not see impacts from Hurricane Dorian.” It went on to conclude that “The Statement undercut the NWS’s forecasts and potentially undercut public trust in NOAA’s and the NWS’s science and the apolitical nature of that science. By requiring NOAA to issue an unattributed statement related to a then-5-day-old tweet, while an active hurricane continued to exist off the east coast of the United States, the Department displayed poor judgment in exercising its authority over NOAA.”
This week a new study from Oxfam revealed that the world’s richest one percent cause more than double the CO2 emissions of the poorest 50%. Experts believe that if the people who make up the richest 10%* continue to consume at this rate for the next 10 years, climate change could surpass the critical 1.5 […]
The Lincoln Project has created some of the most astutely targeted political ads in this election that go straight for Donald Trump’s jugular. They don’t mince words and bluntly convey to American voters the dangers of a second Trump presidency. So they’re exactly the people we wanted to ask about how we (the environmental community) […]
by Amy Lupica, ODP Contributing Writer This week, four former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrators, two of whom served under Republican presidents, sharply criticized the Trump administration’s environmental policy as well as current EPA Chief Andrew Wheeler’s leadership. Among their criticism are assertions that Trump’s EPA has waged a “war on science” and that it […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.