DITCHED: Fossil Fuels, Money Flows, and the Greening of Finance

If you’re an Our Daily Planet reader then you know that the podcast Political Climate is our top pick for understanding the current politics driving climate action (or roadblocking it). But outside of happenings in Congress and across the federal government, the world of green finance is an important component of our collective action to reduce emissions and act on the climate crisis. This topic is exactly what Political Climate co-host Julia Pyper explores in the new mini-series DITCHED which Our Daily Planet is proud to be distributing each Monday.


What began as, in many ways, a symbolic action to take a stand against fossil fuels has morphed into this sophisticated set of strategies that — as one industry analyst put it — is like an anaconda slowly strangling its prey and really denying the fossil fuel industry the capital it so desperately needs.” — Justin Guay, Sunrise Project


A bit about DITCHED: 

You may have seen the headlines about university endowments ditching their fossil fuel investments. Or perhaps you saw the news that Blackrock, one of the world’s largest financial firms, is getting out of coal and putting climate change at the center of its investment strategy.

Pension funds, insurers, family offices and others are also moving their assets out of the fossil fuel industry and re-assessing the risk these resources present to their bottom line — as well as the planet. 

These are all pieces of a growing, global divestment movement. Which is the focus of a new Political Climate miniseries we’re calling DITCHED: Fossil fuels, money flows and the greening of finance.

There are multiple facets to this trend, and many players.

Even oil and gas companies — the very companies that divestment advocates want financial institutions to stop funding — are ditching their dirtiest fossil fuel projects and investing in lower carbon technologies under investor pressure.

Governments have a major role to play here too. Particularly now as economies suffer amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Will propping up fossil fuels help economies rebuild? Or will these projects become stranded assets, assets that lose all of their value in a volatile market and accelerating clean energy transition?


The DITCHED miniseries from Political Climate aims to shed light on the divestment movement. How it started, where it’s headed, who’s involved, and what this trend means for economies and everyday people. 

I’m your host, Julia Pyper, and in this miniseries I’ll speak to activists, academics, fossil fuel industry experts, investors and other key players in and around the divestment and green finance space.

You can catch all DITCHED episodes on Mondays over the next few weeks on the Political Climate podcast feed (and through Our Daily Planet)– available wherever you listen to podcasts. 

Don’t miss a beat! Subscribe to Political Climate and follow us @poli_climate on Instagram and Twitter.


Up Next

We Can’t “Build Back Better” Without Addressing Plastic Pollution

We Can’t “Build Back Better” Without Addressing Plastic Pollution

by Erin Simon, Head of Plastic Waste and Business, World Wildlife Fund   After a year of unprecedented devastation and loss, the arrival of 2021 has shown us at least a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel. Our top priority remains the immediate health and safety of our fellow citizens, but we […]

Continue Reading 960 words

One Cool Thing: Using AI to Count Fish

Fish are so darned hard to count — they live under the surface of the water and they are constantly moving! One of the most important things to know when trying to determine the health of fish stocks is how many have been caught by fishers — particularly the 13.2 million recreational anglers in the […]

Continue Reading 127 words
Biden Administration Flips Switch on Trump’s Inefficient Energy Policies

Biden Administration Flips Switch on Trump’s Inefficient Energy Policies

The Biden administration announced it is reviewing the Trump administration’s energy and water efficiency rules, potentially reversing policies that loosened standards for lightbulbs, showerheads, dishwashers, and other devices. 

Why this Matters: Many of former President Trump’s energy and water policies were not only bad for the environment but also cost-inefficient and burdensome for American consumers, so reversing or amending these rules could benefit customers as well as decrease emissions and water use.

Continue Reading 499 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.