Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Last week, the Trump administration removed Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states. The move was criticized by environmental groups, with some planning to sue over the delisting. “This is no ‘Mission Accomplished’ moment for wolf recovery,” said Kristen Boyles, an Earthjustice attorney, in a statement. “This delisting decision is what happens when bad science drives bad policy — and it’s illegal, so we will see them in court.”
There are now around 6,000 wolves, up from 1,000 when they were first listed under the Act in 1975, but there are still thousands of acres of historical habitat from Utah to Maine where wolves haven’t returned. The population is mostly in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and northern parts of the Rocky Mountains.
Why This Matters: Delisting the species leaves states responsible for any protections, and it’s possible that they’ll decide to allow hunting and trapping. Protections for wolves have already been lifted in a handful of states, including Idaho, where nearly 60 percent of the state’s wolf population was killed just last year.
The wolf populations that do exist are in isolated pockets, which makes their survival less likely. Many ranchers and hunters perceive them as a threat or nuisance. These same feelings and fears are what drove the wolves nearly to extinction: they were poisoned and shot by farmers and ranchers earlier in the 20th century. However, wolves can help keep the ecosystems they live in healthy. The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone was called a “rewilding triumph” by the Guardian earlier this year.
Part of an Anti-Science Pattern Like many of the Trump administration’s environmental policies, the delisting is not based on science. Although Interior Secretary David Bernhardt claimed that “the gray wolf has exceeded all conservation goals for recovery,” The Hill reported that the government’s own peer-reviewed report argued against delisting the wolves.
“The proposed rule did not build on the assembled scientific information to provide coherent factual support or logical explanation for the agency’s conclusions,” one reviewer wrote, arguing that it led Interior “to reach an erroneous conclusion” in delisting the species.
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer As the world warms, it’s not just people who are feeling the heat. Bats are also susceptible to extreme heat, and overheated bat boxes can be “a death trap,” the Guardian reports. In the wild, bats move between rock and tree crevices in search of a perfectly moderated temperature. […]
by Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer A new report entitled The World’s Forgotten Fishes from the World Wildlife Fund has found that there has been a “catastrophic” decline in freshwater fish, with nearly a third of all freshwater fish species coming perilously close to extinction. The statistics paint a sobering picture: 26% of all critically […]
by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer Move over Dolly, there’s a new clone in town and her name is Elizabeth Ann the Black-Footed ferret. You read that right; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) announced on Thursday that it had successfully cloned the first U.S. endangered species. Elizabeth Ann was born on December 10, […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.