Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Last week, the Trump administration removed Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states. The move was criticized by environmental groups, with some planning to sue over the delisting. “This is no ‘Mission Accomplished’ moment for wolf recovery,” said Kristen Boyles, an Earthjustice attorney, in a statement. “This delisting decision is what happens when bad science drives bad policy — and it’s illegal, so we will see them in court.”
There are now around 6,000 wolves, up from 1,000 when they were first listed under the Act in 1975, but there are still thousands of acres of historical habitat from Utah to Maine where wolves haven’t returned. The population is mostly in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and northern parts of the Rocky Mountains.
Why This Matters: Delisting the species leaves states responsible for any protections, and it’s possible that they’ll decide to allow hunting and trapping. Protections for wolves have already been lifted in a handful of states, including Idaho, where nearly 60 percent of the state’s wolf population was killed just last year.
The wolf populations that do exist are in isolated pockets, which makes their survival less likely. Many ranchers and hunters perceive them as a threat or nuisance. These same feelings and fears are what drove the wolves nearly to extinction: they were poisoned and shot by farmers and ranchers earlier in the 20th century. However, wolves can help keep the ecosystems they live in healthy. The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone was called a “rewilding triumph” by the Guardian earlier this year.
Part of an Anti-Science Pattern Like many of the Trump administration’s environmental policies, the delisting is not based on science. Although Interior Secretary David Bernhardt claimed that “the gray wolf has exceeded all conservation goals for recovery,” The Hill reported that the government’s own peer-reviewed report argued against delisting the wolves.
“The proposed rule did not build on the assembled scientific information to provide coherent factual support or logical explanation for the agency’s conclusions,” one reviewer wrote, arguing that it led Interior “to reach an erroneous conclusion” in delisting the species.
By Nilanga Jayasinghe, Manager of the Wildlife Conservation team at World Wildlife Fund Imagine living in a modern, densely populated city. On any given morning, you might expect to look out your window and see a stream of cars and pedestrians on their daily commute, bustling shops and restaurants selling their wares, or perhaps local […]
Guest Post by Azzedine Downes, President & CEO, International Fund for Animal Welfare IFAW has long been a leader in recognizing the inherent link between biodiversity and climate change, the existential threat both issues pose to life on our planet, and the critical need to address both these threats together. This week, the results of […]
President Biden: "Watch out for the cicadas. I just got one – it got me." pic.twitter.com/jfrik4bgpB — The Hill (@thehill) June 9, 2021 If you live in Washington, D.C. the cicadas are hard to ignore. But this week their mating-frenzied existence reached new levels of intrusion in day-to-day DC. On Tuesday evening, as AP’s Jonathan […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.