Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
The news about the energy sector is mixed. The good news is that Exxon is slashing spending by 30% ($10 b) as the President waffles on tariffs on foreign imports, while The New York Times reports solar and wind projects in operation are increasing sales — as a result of utilities cutting costs — because renewables are cheaper than coal.
But, but, but, small solar companies doing residential installations are down, offshore wind power projects are stuck in approval processes, and energy efficiency projects are experiencing problems because the Department of Energy and local utilities, according to E&E News, have encouraged grantees and contractors to suspend or “severely limit” low-income and rebate weatherization and fuel efficiency activities.
Why This Matters: This is the moment to pivot to clean energy. As soon as we can get back to doing energy efficiency retrofits and installing residential solar, we ought to be doing more of that. The irony of the President’s theory of U.S. energy dominance is that we are dependent on oil and gas whether it is because we must sell it or buy it to fuel our economy. The best way to sustain our economy and climate is for our energy to be efficient and renewable.
We do not mean to minimize job losses, but it is significant that Exxon Mobil reduced its 2020 capital budget to $23 billion, down 30 percent from $33 billion, and cut operating expenses by 15 percent, according to The Houston Chronicle. The cuts are planned in West Texas’ Permian Basin, slowing drilling and well completions plus delays in large projects in Mozambique and Guyana. As for solar and wind, those projects that are up and running in places like Texas and California California and Texas, are doing well because they produce electricity more cheaply than natural gas and coal, which have not seen a drop in price despite the virus and the oil price war.
Exxon is going forward, however, with its projected $20 billion investment in manufacturing facilities along the Gulf Coast. And E&E News reported that the “nation’s largest source of energy jobs — the energy efficiency sector — is experiencing mass layoffs from the coronavirus as utility and state programs shut down across the country, according to contractors and industry representatives. Utilities and state energy agencies have halted programs that help homeowners and business owners pay for new installations and building retrofits.” Energy efficiency advocates have urged Congress to expand the energy efficiency tax credits, increase funding for the Energy Department’s weatherization and research and development programs, and bring back a $3.2 billion efficiency and conservation block grant program from the 2009 stimulus. But so far Congress has seen these as unrelated to recovery from the virus — which seems inexplicable given that tens of thousands of workers in this sector are being laid off now because they can’t get into people’s homes to do the work.
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer In the United States, there’s a growing need to scale up high-speed broadband and clean energy infrastructure. A new housing initiative in New York City will take on both with a single project: setting buildings up for solar power, then using the energy cost savings to bring high-speed internet […]
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer This week, Poland announced it will close the coal-fired Belchatow power plant by the end of 2036. The country’s national energy group opted not to develop an open-pit coal mine to power the plant after deciding it would not make financial sense. The decision comes as Poland’s Lodz region […]
Thousands of protesters gathered near the headwaters of the Mississippi River from around the country, including actresses Jane Fonda and Patricia Arquette, in an attempt to disrupt the construction of a major pipeline through northern Minnesota, the Duluth Tribune reported.
Why This Matters: The Line 3 pipeline, at a cost of $4B, will carry hundreds of thousands of barrels of dirty Canadian tar-sands oil through the U.S. across at least 200 bodies of water and sensitive watersheds.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.