Exxon Climate Accounting Fraud Trial Begins Today in NYC

Photo: PBS

The Attorney General (AG) of New York state sued Exxon Mobil last fall after a four-year investigation into the question of whether the company misled investors on the costs to the company of future regulation of the industry that would be needed to curb greenhouse gas emissions.  The state alleges that “Exxon’s internal calculations didn’t match its public representations,” and that those misrepresentations caused investors to pay more for the stock than they should have — to the tune of  “between $476 million and $1.6 billion.”

Why This Matters:  This is the definition of a “bet the company” lawsuit — maybe even a “bet the industry” case since they all would be guilty by association.  Of the many lawsuits brought against big oil and gas companies (by kids, cities, states and fishers) this one has the biggest potential to burn them.  Investor disclosure laws are strict — and the government alleges that the decisions regarding what they did not disclose went all the way up to Exxon’s CEO at the time, Rex Tillerson, who is expected to testify.  If NY wins, there will be a slew of additional lawsuits to join the other similar ones pending in New Jersey and Texas If the company wins, it will insulate the company and the industry from further climate change legal challenges.

What NY State Argues

As Inside Climate News explains, “[f]or years, Exxon had been using something called a proxy cost of carbon to estimate what stricter climate policies might mean for its bottom line. But as pressure from shareholders grew, a problem came sharply into focus: An internal presentation warned top executives that the way the company had been applying this proxy cost was potentially misleading. That’s because Exxon didn’t have one projected cost of carbon. It had two.”

NY State intends to show that the company disclosed one set of these projected carbon costs to investors, telling investors that it was taking into account the full future costs of regulations it expected governments to adopt in response to climate change.  But internally, The Wall Street Journal explains, the company was low balling the costs — for example, the NY AG says that for the oil-sands projects in Alberta, Canada, Exxon understated the costs of future government regulation by $25 billion.  Inside Climate News reported that the “effect of using these dueling estimates, the attorney general says, was that Exxon hid tens of billions of dollars in potential costs, downplaying the risk to investors and inflating the company’s value.”

Exxon’s Argument

In essence, the Company argues it was impossible to know — they did the best they could to estimate the cost of future regulations.  So in the Alberta tar sands example above the Company argues that “regulation in Alberta ‘has been and remains in flux, with rival political factions enacting and repealing climate regulations regularly.'”

To Go Deeper:  Read the Inside Climate News story here.

Up Next

General Motors’ Massive “COP” Out

General Motors’ Massive “COP” Out

On Tuesday, while governments struggled mightily to deal with the climate emergency at the UN Climate Meeting and U.S. stakeholders tried to make lemonade out of the U.S. pullout of the Paris Accord by proclaiming that U.S. Governors, Mayors, and major corporations are “Still In,” back in Detroit, General Motors rolled out their largest SUV ever — adding 7 full inches to the Tahoe truck. 

Why This Matters:  Transportation accounts for 23% of carbon emissions globally according to the IPCC.  As long as gas is cheap, car companies will keep making gas guzzlers and the public will keep buying them.

Continue Reading 314 words
Germany Is Closing Nuclear Power Plants — But What To Do With the Waste For A Million Years?

Germany Is Closing Nuclear Power Plants — But What To Do With the Waste For A Million Years?

Where does one store nearly 2,000 containers of high-level radioactive waste that is absolutely unbreakable and guaranteed to never leak? That is the challenge facing a team of German scientists tasked with figuring out how to safely close down all of Germany’s nuclear power plants by 2031 — and the bar is high — they […]

Continue Reading 494 words
Trump Administration Wants to Ditch Energy-Efficient Dishwashers

Trump Administration Wants to Ditch Energy-Efficient Dishwashers

The Trump Administration announced its intention to roll back yet another climate change efficiency standard.  The Hill reported that the Energy Department is planning to allow faster-cleaning dishwashers that do not comply with current energy efficiency standards, which will overturn years of progress on making these appliances energy efficient.

Why This Matters:  Many Americans will give thanks on Thursday for their dishwashers. And most do not object to the time it takes for them to operate – they just want clean, safe dishes. 

Continue Reading 389 words