Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
Andrew Adamski looks through tomatoes on his family’s farm. Image: Danny Damiani/USA Today Network-Wisconsin
Land use and agriculture have recently gained attention as a means to store more carbon in the ground and help fight climate change. However, in the United States, while federal programs do exist to help farmers better manage their soil (most notably the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) and the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)) there are too many farmers wanting this assistance and not enough resources to go around. While many farmers are willing to better their land-use practices, a trade war with China along with devastating floods this past spring have already left them with few resources to invest in new technology.Amber Radatz, co-director of the Wisconsin farmer-led research program Discovery Farms, which aims to help farmers improve water quality and emissions recently told the Appleton Post Crescent that:
“Just saying, ‘As a whole, none of you are doing enough,’ can be really frustrating. When the economics of the situation are also played into it … how do you want me to do more when I’m struggling to survive, as is?”
No Financial Incentives: Farmers told the Post Crescent that the market doesn’t reward them for more sustainable farming practices, rather they’re only incentivized to increase yield. Hence, investing in new vertical tilling machinery and planting cover crops isn’t making their crops more valuable compared to the next farm over that isn’t investing in these practices.
Not every farmer can afford $55,000 in new tillage equipment — and certainly not with the added risk that it may not work as expected.
And though some consumers are seeking out sustainably sourced items like pastured pork and free-range chicken, the broader marketplace generally doesn’t reward environmental stewardship
Farmers need help making these investments and some market assurance that they will actually see a return.
Why This Matters: Farmers are saying they need more incentives to green their practices including, surprisingly, more regulation. Some in the farming community want the use of cover crops to be a requirement in order to level the playing field among farmers–Midwestern states have already been testing voluntary vs. mandatory conservation practices and have seen success. At #ClimateForum2020 several of the presidential candidates expressed that they are willing to support expanded funding for sustainable farming, which is good as farmers can’t do this on their own yet better land use can go a long way in reducing atmospheric carbon.
Go Deeper: As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, some struggling farmers are turning their flood-damaged land into solar farms to help make ends meet.
by Julia Fine Last month, we wrote about the outbreak of locust swarms traveling from East Africa to the Indian subcontinent. Now, as the New York Times reported yesterday, the locusts have made their way to New Delhi. The capital region’s fields, metro stations, suburbs, and more are now teeming with swarms. We previously noted […]
Our nation is in the midst of a moment where statues and monuments celebrating our racist past are being reevaluated and taken down. However, some on the political right have begun calling into question the validity of this conversation. Conservative media personality Meghan McCain wrote in a tweet that we’re “one week removed from entire […]
The House was set to vote to pass the Great American Outdoors Act, which will provide nearly $1B annually for parks and other conservation, but a group of Western Republicans has raised procedural hurdles that will delay final passage until late July, The Hillreported yesterday. And, a new report from the Center for American Progress (CAP) urges the United States to launch a major effort—a “Race for Nature” — to help the nation’s agricultural producers, who are facing a bleak economic future, by increasing opportunities to pay them for their conservation efforts.
Why This Matters: As the CAP Report explains, “Family farmers and ranchers need lifelines…Bold and swift investment in nature conservation can provide one.”
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.