Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Yet, the biggest atonement for these misdeeds should enatil Ford and GM becoming true partners in the transition away from internal combustion engines. Thus far, Ford and GM have indicated that they plan to heavily invest in electric vehicles, yet the auto giants will also need to play a part in countering widespread public misperception about EVs that prevents people from buying them.
The Science:As Scientific American explained, “the basic physics of climate change have been known for more than a century, but it is in recent decades that the fundamental science of global warming has solidified.” Climate change as we know it became news 30 years ago, yet the urgency of the climate crisis wasn’t taken seriously by most lawmakers or the public until recently.
Company scientists, like this exposé reveals, knew about the dangers of unabated emissions, yet they failed to ring any alarm bells for fear of hindering business. A GM spokesperson told E&E news in response to their piece that, “There is nothing we can say about events that happened one or two generations ago since they are irrelevant to the company’s positions and strategy today.”
Going Forward: While EV and hybrid technology didn’t become commercially available in the United States until about 20 years ago, both Ford and GM waited a long time to get into game. How they do from here on out, in terms of the vehicles they sell and the ways in which they shape perception of zero-emissions vehicles through marketing will be the story to watch.
This past summer, Ford signed a binding emissions reductions agreement with California after the Trump administration wouldn’t renew the state’s Clean Air Act waiver to set its own vehicle emissions levels. Meanwhile, California said that it would no longer purchase GM vehicles after the automaker backed the Trump administration’s actions. This could be an indication how how committed each automaker is to climate action.
The Political Equation: GM and Ford sell 75% of their trucks in states that Donald Trump won, and many of those states have governors and legislatures which will not be friendly to expanding electric vehicle infrastructure. This is where Ford and GM must use their political muscle to encourage better adoption of EVs, trade-ins, and other political incentives that help Americans make the switch.
by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer On Friday, the Biden administration announced that it would be returning to the Obama-era method of calculating the “social cost of greenhouse gasses.” This metric is a measure of how much each metric ton of carbon emitted will cost future generations, including the costs of hurricane damage, flooding, wildfires, and other effects of […]
In a little-noticed report that could have major implications for both the Eastern U.S. and Europe, scientists announced last week that Atlantic Ocean currents are thought to be 15% weaker than in 1950. The Washington Post explained, saying that the “system of currents that includes the Florida Current and the Gulf Stream, is now ‘in its weakest state in over a millennium.'”
Why This Matters: We need to understand both these phenomena better to predict climate events. They are quite a coincidence.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.