G7’s Green Recovery: Promises Kept?

By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer

The G7 countries have spent more on fossil fuels than clean energy since last March, a new study led by the non-profit Tearfund shows. The seven countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) from January 2020 through March of 2021 spent a combined $189 billion to support oil, coal, and gas versus $147 billion on clean energy projects. The fossil fuel money was mostly given without any conditions about emissions or pollution, and the biggest beneficiaries were bailouts to transportation companies like British Airways, Renault, and Honda. 

Why This Matters: The economic upheaval of the pandemic and its accompanying stimulus could have been a chance to pump money into the country’s net-zero goals. Instead, it appears that the members propped up the very industries that are increasing carbon in the atmosphere. These seven countries are among the most polluting and the wealthiest on earth. These two superlatives are linked: the world’s richest nations cause disproportionate emissions. People living in G7 countries are 10% of the global population but are responsible for nearly 25% of global emissions. These countries have the money to transition from carbon-intensive economies — if only they would “walk the walk.” 

This Quote Says It All

“Choices made now by the G7 countries will either accelerate the transition towards a climate-safe future for all, or jeopardise efforts to date to tackle the climate crisis,” Paul Cook, the head of advocacy at Tearfund, one of the groups involved in the analysis, said in a statement. 

Recommendations for a Greener Recovery

The report offered a shortlist of suggestions for the seven countries going forward:

  • Getting rid of no-strings-attached financial support for fossil fuels — future funds should have “green strings” tied to spur clean energy
  • Increase the proportion of Covid relief spending from 22% to 40%
  • Use financial power and influence to move toward a carbon-free future by doubling their financial commitment to lower-income countries, stopping financing for fossil fuel projects overseas, and persuading development banks to align with climate goals.

To Go Deeper: Check out the full report by Tearfund and its partners here.

Up Next

Clean Energy Means More Electricity, Can US Cities Meet the Demand?

Clean Energy Means More Electricity, Can US Cities Meet the Demand?

By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer Cities across the US are transitioning their buildings to clean energy, which would mean banning natural gas in new construction and promoting electric appliances. But the question remains whether or not infrastructure — foundational and historic — is ready to handle such a demand for electricity.    Why this […]

Continue Reading 358 words
One Cool Thing: Electric Rentals

One Cool Thing: Electric Rentals

As more people around the nation are taking to the roads and skies for their vaccinated vacations, one car rental company is making it easier for folks to not only travel in style, but travel green. Hertz has announced that it will be purchasing 100,000 Tesla electric vehicles by the end of 2022 alongside an […]

Continue Reading 152 words
Climate Change-Fueled Weather Increasing Power Outages

Climate Change-Fueled Weather Increasing Power Outages

By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Last year, the average American household experienced eight hours without power, as storms hammered electrical systems built with less erratic climate conditions in mind. That average outage time is double what it was five years ago. But only looking at the average obscures the experience of people who lived […]

Continue Reading 421 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.