Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
The G7 countries have spent more on fossil fuels than clean energy since last March, a new study led by the non-profit Tearfund shows. The seven countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) from January 2020 through March of 2021 spent a combined $189 billion to support oil, coal, and gas versus $147 billion on clean energy projects. The fossil fuel money was mostly given without any conditions about emissions or pollution, and the biggest beneficiaries were bailouts to transportation companies like British Airways, Renault, and Honda.
Why This Matters: The economic upheaval of the pandemic and its accompanying stimulus could have been a chance to pump money into the country’s net-zero goals. Instead, it appears that the members propped up the very industries that are increasing carbon in the atmosphere. These seven countries are among the most polluting and the wealthiest on earth. These two superlatives are linked: the world’s richest nations cause disproportionate emissions. People living in G7 countries are 10% of the global population but are responsible for nearly 25% of global emissions. These countries have the money to transition from carbon-intensive economies — if only they would “walk the walk.”
This QuoteSays It All
“Choices made now by the G7 countries will either accelerate the transition towards a climate-safe future for all, or jeopardise efforts to date to tackle the climate crisis,” Paul Cook, the head of advocacy at Tearfund, one of the groups involved in the analysis, said in a statement.
Recommendations for a Greener Recovery
The report offered a shortlist of suggestions for the seven countries going forward:
Getting rid of no-strings-attached financial support for fossil fuels — future funds should have “green strings” tied to spur clean energy
Increase the proportion of Covid relief spending from 22% to 40%
Use financial power and influence to move toward a carbon-free future by doubling their financial commitment to lower-income countries, stopping financing for fossil fuel projects overseas, and persuading development banks to align with climate goals.
To Go Deeper: Check out the full report by Tearfund and its partners here.
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Would you support or oppose the government moving the country to a 100% clean energy electricity grid by 2035? That’s the question Washington-based think tank Third Way posed across the country. It turns out that a majority of voters support federal action to reach a 100% clean energy grid. […]
Last week, the Battle Born Solar Project in Nevada, which would have been the largest solar farm in the US, was canceled after a coalition of local activists lobbied against it for being an “eyesore.” As Electrek reported, California-based Arevia Power and Solar Partners VII LLC withdrew their application with the Bureau of Land Management […]
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Carbon pricing has been a part of how the European Union penalizes carbon emissions since 2005. As part of the EU’s Fit for 55 update to the carbon market, emission trading expands to include heating and road transportation. However, instead of folding them into the broader market, these two […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.