Trump Administration OKs Draining the Swamp — The Okefenokee Swamp

Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge

Photo: Recreation.gov

By Natasha Lasky, ODP Contributing Writer

Companies have been trying to mine near Georgia’s Okefenokee Swamp National Wildlife Refuge for decades without success, but last August the Army Corps of Engineers determined that now no federal Clean Water Act permit is needed because there are no water bodies covered by the law that will be impacted.  Earlier this year, The Trump administration finalized the “Navigable Waters Rule,” which greatly reduced how many bodies of water receive federal protection. Previously, the Okefenokee Swamp was protected under the Clean Water Act, but now, the mining company, Twin Pines Minerals, can go forward with extracting titanium in a 600-acre area around the refuge regardless of the impacts on the Swamp or the Floridan Aquifer, which is an important water source in the region.

Why This Matters:  The president of Twin Pines claims that the mining operation won’t affect the swamp — but now we will just have to take their word for it since it won’t have to go through federal permitting.  Environmentalists fear that the mine would harm the swamp’s ability to store water, damage its habitats, and increase the risk of wildfires.  The swamp is about half the size of Rhode Island — but is not covered by the Clean Water Act as it has been interpreted by the Trump administration. This is a painful illustration of the devastating effects of the Trump environmental rollbacks.

The Dire Consequences of Mining

“The only data, anywhere, to suggest that mining would prove benign was that commissioned by Twin Pines itself,” Christian Hunt, the Southeast Program Representative with Defenders of Wildlife, told The Hill.  “I can go through a whole litany of threats to the hydrology, to nature,” Rena Peck, executive director of the Georgia River Network, told NPR. The threats include: pollution in streams, lower water levels in the swamp and light pollution that would seep into the refuge. The swamp also has deep cultural significance for the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, who were forcibly removed from the area in the 19th century. The Muscogee gave Okefenokee its name, which is said to mean “bubbling water.”

This isn’t the first time that a company has tried to mine in the Okefenokee Swamp. In the 1990s, chemical giant DuPont planned to mine titanium in nearly the same place as the Twin Pines plan. However, the plan met opposition from the public and from the federal government, so much so that DuPont didn’t submit a permit application, and instead donated 16,000 acres of the Okefenokee to the nonprofit Conservation Fund in 1997.

While this new 600-acre project will still need a permit from the state of Georgia, it’s likely to go through. The county commission unanimously passed a resolution in support of the project in August, since the mining operation is expected to create hundreds of jobs. The plan has the Trump administration’s support as well, because it argues that finding domestic sources for minerals like titanium is a national security priority. 

But the potential benefits of mining do not outweigh the costs. Teresa Crawford, who grew up near the swamp and testified for the county commission in August, told NPR: “The Okefenokee swamp is just a treasure. We can’t make a new one. And if it’s destroyed, I mean, it’s gone forever.”

Up Next

California to Nestlé: Stop Draining Our Water

California to Nestlé: Stop Draining Our Water

As California’s drought conditions are worsening, Nestle is pumping millions of gallons of water from the San Bernardino forest. State water officials have drafted a cease-and-desist order to force the company to stop overpumping from Strawberry Creek, which provides drinking water for about 750,000 people. 

Why This Matters: It’s not the first time other states have also tried to reign in Nestle for its water grabs.

Continue Reading 377 words
Maine’s Lakes on Thin Ice

Maine’s Lakes on Thin Ice

The ice-out date for Maine’s Lake Auburn is now three weeks earlier than it was two centuries ago, the Portland Press Herald reports, and other lakes across New England show similar trends. Climate change is not good for ice, and that includes Maine’s lakes that freeze over every winter. 

Why This Matters: A disrupted winter with lakes that “defrost” earlier has multiple knock-on effects for freshwater: in addition to harming fish in lakes, the resulting large cyanobacteria algae blooms that form can be harmful to human health.

Continue Reading 479 words
Over 80% of Mexico Affected by Drought Conditions 

Over 80% of Mexico Affected by Drought Conditions 

by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Drought conditions cover 85% of Mexico as lakes and reservoirs dry up across the country. Mexico City is experiencing its worst drought in 30 years, and the reservoirs and aquifers are so depleted that some residents don’t have tap water. The capital city relies on water pumped in from […]

Continue Reading 460 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.