Goldman Sachs Will Not Fund Arctic Drilling, Pledges $750B to Fight Climate Change

In a move that drew praise from leading environmental organizations, Goldman Sachs announced a sweeping new “environmental policy framework” on Sunday, with major commitments to fund $750B in climate change resilience and adaptation projects, clean energy development, and to more thoroughly analyze fracking projects before funding them (though it does not rule them out entirely).  What they promised NOT to fund is also noteworthy — Goldman ruled out funding for projects to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic, new thermal coal mine and power plant development around the world, as well as projects that significantly convert or degrade a natural habitat.

Why This Matters:  This puts Goldman Sachs well in the lead among U.S. banks for making a commitment to both climate change and environmental protection generally.  According to the Sierra Club’s analysis, Goldman’s policy is the strongest regarding future coal development, and they are the only bank to put restrictions on funding for oil and gas projects.  But other banks globally have even more progressive environmental policies, and these foreign banks have already pledged not to fund Arctic drilling.  Still, this is a huge elevation of ambitions for one of the biggest names in banking and a financial boost for climate-related projects that was sorely needed, given the disappointing end to the UN climate meeting.

Goldman’s Rationale – It’s Good Business 

In an op/ed in the Financial Times, David Solomon, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, called on governments to put a price on the cost of carbon saying, “There is not only an urgent need to act, but also a powerful business and investing case to do so.”  On the Arctic drilling issue, members of the Gwich’in First Nation of Alaska met with officials from all the major U.S. banks in October of 2018 and explained the risks financing oil and gas exploration there would pose to the tribe’s way of life and livelihoods.  No other U.S. bank has made a similar pledge, though a dozen other foreign banks agreed to withhold support from Arctic oil and gas projects.

“Drilling in the Arctic Refuge would permanently destroy the primary food source of the Gwich’in people, our culture, and our way of life,” said Bernadette Demientieff, Executive Director of the Gwich’in Steering Committee. “The Trump administration may have made up their minds about selling off this sacred place, but the fight is far from over. We’re glad to see Goldman Sachs recognize that the Arctic Refuge is no place for drilling and we hope that other banks, and the oil companies they fund, will follow their lead.”

To Go Deeper:  Read the full Goldman Environmental Policy Framework here.  And read the analysis of its strengths and shortcomings by Sierra Club and Rainforest Action Network here.

Up Next

US Green Diplomat Previews Glasgow

US Green Diplomat Previews Glasgow

By WW0 Staff For the United States, the post-Trump, pre-COP26 road to Glasgow has been paved with ambition and humility. In a major speech, the President’s Envoy, John Kerry, previewed the results of his climate diplomacy before heading into two weeks of intense deliberations of world leaders. Speaking at the London School of Economics — […]

Continue Reading 421 words
One Cool Thing: COP26 Coverage Kickoff

One Cool Thing: COP26 Coverage Kickoff

Next week, the COP26 climate conference in Glasgow will draw hundreds of world leaders to Glasgow to determine the path forward five years after the Paris Climate Agreement (for a primer, read this) as new science underscores the urgency. The conference aims to squeeze countries to strengthen the commitments they’ve made towards securing global net-zero […]

Continue Reading 194 words
DOD Says Climate Change Increases National Security Risks

DOD Says Climate Change Increases National Security Risks

By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor In a report released last week, the Department of Defense (DOD) confirmed that existing risks and security challenges in the US are being made worse due to “increasing temperatures; changing precipitation patterns; and more frequent, intense, and unpredictable extreme weather conditions caused by climate change. Now, the Pentagon is […]

Continue Reading 440 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.