Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
In the United States, the green economy generates $1.3 trillion in annual sales revenue while creating 9.5 million full-time jobs (4% of the working-age population). That’s according to a new study from University College London climatologist Mark Maslin and researcher Lucien Georgeson whose research shows that the green economy has 10 times more jobs than the fossil fuel industry in America.
Key Points: While gathering data on the green economy was difficult because our government doesn’t keep data on this sector (The Bureau of Labor Statistics used to publish a “Green Goods and Services” survey, but it was discontinued in 2013 following budget cuts), the authors of the study noted that,
“The green economy is driving growth and job creation in the United States, but as the rest of the world catches up, the U.S. will have to enact new and supportive policies to remain competitive.”
The Facts Speak: As Silvio Marcacciwrote in Forbes earlier this year, the economic prowess of the renewable energy sector is undeniable.
Nearly 335,000 people work in the solar industry and more than 111,000 work in the wind industry, compared to 211,000 working in coal mining or other fossil fuel extraction.
Clean energy employment grew 3.6% in 2018, adding 110,000 net new jobs (4.2% of all jobs added nationally in 2018), and employers expect 6% job growth in 2019.
So Why Aren’t More Labor Unions Behind the Green New Deal? The Green New Deal (GND), a framework proposed by Democrats earlier this year to make massive investments in renewable energy infrastructure and green jobs, hasn’t been universally embraced by labor unions. Unions like the Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA) and the United Mine Workers have remained skeptical of the GND and worry that Democrats don’t have enough specificity to ensure a “just transition” for fossil fuel workers who may lose their jobs.
As the Stockholm Environment Institute explained, “Most policies assume that justice goals will be achieved by helping those dependent on coal, oil and gas move into new roles; however, there is little critical reflection on what justice means in the context of an energy transition away from fossil fuels.”
Why This Matters: It’s undeniable that the jobs of the future–as well as the jobs necessary to fight climate change–will come from renewable energy generation but also sectors like electric vehicle manufacturing, carbon capture, waste management, etc. This fact is especially important for Democrats who want to beat Donald Trump and win both houses of Congress: they have to start talking about the jobs that will be available to workers through their vision of the future. Currently, Democrats are worried about losing Ohio in the presidential race, a state that has seen mass layoffs of workers, yet Sen. Sherrod Brown (Ohio’s only statewide Democratic representative) refuses to support the Green New Deal as it’s not resonating back home. Democrats have to be more clear about where American jobs are coming from and be specific about why they are the party that will continue to support these jobs and the workers who need them.
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer In the United States, there’s a growing need to scale up high-speed broadband and clean energy infrastructure. A new housing initiative in New York City will take on both with a single project: setting buildings up for solar power, then using the energy cost savings to bring high-speed internet […]
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer This week, Poland announced it will close the coal-fired Belchatow power plant by the end of 2036. The country’s national energy group opted not to develop an open-pit coal mine to power the plant after deciding it would not make financial sense. The decision comes as Poland’s Lodz region […]
Thousands of protesters gathered near the headwaters of the Mississippi River from around the country, including actresses Jane Fonda and Patricia Arquette, in an attempt to disrupt the construction of a major pipeline through northern Minnesota, the Duluth Tribune reported.
Why This Matters: The Line 3 pipeline, at a cost of $4B, will carry hundreds of thousands of barrels of dirty Canadian tar-sands oil through the U.S. across at least 200 bodies of water and sensitive watersheds.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.