How to Hire More Women in STEM

As National Geographic once explained, women make up half the national workforce, earn more college and graduate degrees than men, and by some estimates represent the largest single economic force in the world. Yet the gender gap in fields like science, technology, engineering, maths and medicine (STEMM) fields is still staggering.

A survey conducted by L’Oréal last year showed that while career opportunities for woman in STEMM fields are rising, 91% percent of women in the field admitted that gender discrimination remains a career obstacle and a shocking 100% of respondents in the survey agreed that self-doubt and a lack of confidence stand in their way. Furthermore, some 88% of respondents shared that gender bias serves as an obstacle to women’s career trajectories, specifically in the postdoctoral stage.

And now, a new report from the US National Academies has given guidance to how universities and employers can hire more women. It states that the recruitment and retention of women in STEMM programs and careers can be improved if university admissions officers, human resources staff and hiring committees expand the networks from which candidates are drawn. They also urge the development of guidance for academia on how to write job ads and conduct interviews inclusively, as well as strategies to lessen bias in university hiring and promotion decisions.

How To Hire More Women: According to Chemistry World Magazine, the National Academies recommend the following ways to ensure the representation of women in STEMM fields from academia as well as government science agencies:

  •  It argues that agencies like the NSF and National Institutes of Health should hold research institutions accountable by carrying out regular data collection activities, and monitoring progress via ‘equity audits’.
  • The report’s authors also advise that funding agencies consider the efforts of institutions and individual researchers to support greater equity, diversity and inclusion as part of their proposal compliance, review and award process.

Why This Matters: The perspectives of women are critical for the advancement of science and medicine. Male bias is dangerous for women’s health, affects how spacesuits and rockets are designed, and even skews how specimens in science museums are curated. If we’re going to tell girls that they can be “anything they want to be when they grow up” then we have to ensure that our society and institutions are capable of accommodating those dreams.

Read This: Our hero of the week last week was the late NASA mathematician Katherine Johnson, read Mae Jemison’s (the first African-American woman in space) New York Times op-ed about what Katherine’s life and legacy means to her.

Up Next

Coney Barrett’s Climate Controversy

Coney Barrett’s Climate Controversy

President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, created a bit of controversy during her nomination hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week when she called climate change itself “controversial.” 

Why This Matters:  Judge Barrett many questions with the same refrain — she refused to discuss her “policy” views on questions as obvious as do “poll watchers” who are armed intimidate voters, whether birth control should be decriminalized, or if same-sex marriage should be allowed.

Continue Reading 410 words
Heroine of the Week: Betty Reid Soskin, the Oldest Park Ranger in the U.S.

Heroine of the Week: Betty Reid Soskin, the Oldest Park Ranger in the U.S.

  This week we salute Betty Reid Soskin, who at 99 is the nation’s oldest park ranger.  She works at the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park in Richmond, California, and has since her mid-80s. She began her involvement while the park was still being planned.  Betty is Black and worked […]

Continue Reading 167 words
Trump’s Law and Order Presidency Doesn’t Reach Environmental Criminals

Trump’s Law and Order Presidency Doesn’t Reach Environmental Criminals

Environmental enforcement actions — criminal and civil cases against polluters — have dropped dramatically during the Trump administration, according to a new study out of the University of Michigan Law School.

Why this Matters:  So much for the “law and order” President.  President Trump and the Attorney General may want to prosecute protesters, but big corporations that violate pollution laws and risk the public’s health — not so much.

Continue Reading 504 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.