Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle.
Image: Dallas Krentzel via Wikimedia Commons
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer
Earlier this year, Ecuador’s new President Guillermo Lasso issued decrees to expand oil and mining projects in the Amazon. Indigenous communities from the country’s rainforest are now suing the government in an effort to stop these projects, calling them a “policy of death,” according to reporting by Reuters. Community leaders are asking Ecuador’s Constitutional Court — the highest in the country — to nullify the decrees and stop the projects from moving forward.
“The Ecuadorian government sees in our territory only resource interests,” said Waorani leader Nemonte Nenquimo outside the court. “Our territory is our decision, and we’ll never allow oil or mining companies to enter and destroy our home and kill our culture.”
Why This Matters: First and foremost, drilling for oil or mining minerals in the Ecuadorian Amazon is a direct threat to the dozens of Indigenous communities who live there. These extractive processes poison the water and air around them. Indigenous communities are also most likely to experience climate impacts because of their close relationship with the natural world. And on a global scale, clearing parts of the Amazon to extract oil or set up mining operations is counter-productive to global climate goals.
Ecuador’s Indigenous Communities Have Been Here Before
Former President of Ecuador Lenin Moreno pushed to expand copper mining. But indigenous communities filed complaints and marched against the project, saying that they weren’t adequately consulted.
As Josefina Tunki, president of the Shuar-Arutam, told Reuters last December: “The government approved concessions years ago without providing information and without the knowledge of the Shuar-Arutam people. The people have said ‘no‘ to having this large-scale extractivist company in our territory.”
The mining project was contentious from the beginning, when its first camp in 2016 displaced eight families and wiped Nankints, an ancestral village, off the map.
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer The giant sequoia trees in California’s Sequoia National Park are over 1,000 years old and could live another 2,000 years, but climate change-fueled fires are killing them. The trees can usually withstand the flames, but the intensity of recent fires has been overpowering. Last year’s Castle Fire killed up […]
Continue Reading 385 words
By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor As wildfires and deforestation grip the Amazon rainforest, Indigenous communities are urging world governments to pledge to protect 80% of the forest by 2025. The groups launched their campaign at a biodiversity conference in France, where experts from around the world are laying the groundwork for the UN’s delayed […]
Continue Reading 441 words
By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer A new assessment found that at least 30% of the world’s 60,000 tree species are nearing extinction in the wild. The number of tree species threatened— 17,500— is twice that of threatened mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles combined. Why this Matters: Trees are crucial to maintaining the earth’s ecosystems. Trees not […]
Continue Reading 274 wordsSubscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.
