Is America Foisting Its Plastic Problem On Africa?

Screenshot of The Intercept:  Dandora municipal dump site in Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.              Photo: Khadija Farah for The Intercept

By Julia Fine, ODP Contributing Writer

The New York Times reported this week that an industry group “representing the world’s largest chemical makers and fossil fuel companies” is attempting, as part of a trade deal being negotiated now, to get Kenya to “reverse its strict limits on plastics,” as well as to get the country to “continue importing foreign plastic garbage, a practice that it has pledged to limit.”

This attempt to get countries in the Global South to be a “dumping grounds for the world’s plastic waste” goes beyond Kenya. As Ed Brzytwa, of the American Chemistry Council, wrote in a letter to the Office of the US Trade Representative obtained by the NYT, “We anticipate that Kenya could serve in the future as a hub for supplying U.S.-made chemicals and plastics to other markets in Africa through this trade agreement.”

Why This Matters: This plan represents, as Unearthed reported, an “attempt to legally circumvent the new rules on plastic waste” which were delineated under last year’s Basel Convention. The chemical industry’s efforts to ease the export of plastic waste are pernicious and a form of environmental racism. Plastic waste causes both environmental and public health problems for Kenyans, including clogged waterways, flooding, respiratory problems, and more. As the NYT noted, these proposals “could also make it tougher to regulate plastics in the United States.” We need to stop allowing plastic manufacturers to externalize the costs of plastic pollution on citizens in the U.S. who are stuck purchasing it, on cities that are stuck collecting and processing plastic waste, and ultimately on countries where we try to dump it.

Undermining the Basel Convention

As we reported last year, 186 nations agreed last year to “require countries to monitor and control the movement of plastic waste between national borders in order to deal with the world’s plastic crisis”; these rules are to be implemented in 2021. The United States was one of just two countries attending the Basel Convention meeting that has refused to ratify the agreement.

Dr. Innocent Nnorom, an associate professor in environmental chemistry, told Unearthed that this industry lobbying effort is working to undermine the rules set by the Basel Convention. In his words, “It appears that loopholes are being sought to continue the trade in plastic waste. Once in Africa, the emerging free trade routes could be used to facilitate transboundary movements to other African countries. The African Union and its member states should be on the look-out.”

Continued Greenwashing

Many of the companies in the American Chemistry Council, including Shell, Exxon, and Total, were actually “founders of a $1bn initiative that pledges to create a ‘world free of plastic.’

Senator Tom Udall decried the “double-dealing,” of these companies telling Unearthed,

“It is outrageous that petrochemical and plastic industries claim the solution to our mounting plastic waste crisis is to produce more disposable plastic. These same companies and corporations then point the finger at developing nations for the plastic waste showing up in our oceans. This double-dealing makes clear what the true source of our plastic waste crisis is: companies and corporations off-shoring their responsibilities to make billions of dollars”

To Go Deeper: Read this story by Sharon Lerner from The Intercept about Africa’s “exploding” plastic problem.  It is worth your time.

Up Next

One Cool Thing: Using AI to Count Fish

Fish are so darned hard to count — they live under the surface of the water and they are constantly moving! One of the most important things to know when trying to determine the health of fish stocks is how many have been caught by fishers — particularly the 13.2 million recreational anglers in the […]

Continue Reading 127 words
Biden Administration Flips Switch on Trump’s Inefficient Energy Policies

Biden Administration Flips Switch on Trump’s Inefficient Energy Policies

The Biden administration announced it is reviewing the Trump administration’s energy and water efficiency rules, potentially reversing policies that loosened standards for lightbulbs, showerheads, dishwashers, and other devices. 

Why this Matters: Many of former President Trump’s energy and water policies were not only bad for the environment but also cost-inefficient and burdensome for American consumers, so reversing or amending these rules could benefit customers as well as decrease emissions and water use.

Continue Reading 499 words
Protecting Nature Through “Personhood”

Protecting Nature Through “Personhood”

Clean water is a human right, and some cities are ensuring it by giving their waters legal personhood. Legal rights for nature are a growing movement in environmental law, putting the natural world on more equal footing in court. 

Why this Matters: The natural world is essential for us humans to survive. From oil spills to toxic PFAS chemicals to leaking landfills, there are plenty of threats from human activity. Protecting the environment is beneficial to our own health in the short term

Continue Reading 438 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.