Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Data from Bending the Curve: The Restorative Power of Plant Based Diets from WWF. Graphic by Annabel Driussi for Our Daily Planet
by Brent Loken, Global Lead Food Scientist, World Wildlife Fund
There are few things more confusing than deciding which diet is best for people and planet. The internet is rife with hyperbolic headlines, oversimplified solutions, and heavily promoted remedies, all of which stoke division and squash good old common sense. Yes, eating in a healthy and sustainable manner may be complicated, but we can make matters worse for nature if we don’t carefully look at the evidence before taking a bite. When it comes to food, it’s not so simple.
Below are five commonly held “myths” I often hear about healthy and sustainable diets. They are often promoted with passion and good intentions but are ultimately not as straightforward as often believed.
Myth 1: Local food production is always more sustainable
This idea has received a lot of attention in recent months, but it’s context dependent. Yes, there are many countries that can grow a majority of their food locally and in these places, it may be the most environmentally friendly way of producing food. But in some cases, relying mainly on local food production could actually increase greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss. Many countries still face significant burdens of undernutrition and to address this, they may need to increase overall food consumption. But creating extra supply by only increasing local food production could see countries like Indonesia and Madagascar converting more carbon-rich and biologically diverse forests into croplands. For many countries it may be impossible, without help, to self-address their burdens of undernutrition, protect their forests, and lower their food-related greenhouse gas emissions. And what about countries that are not blessed with rich soils and abundant croplands? How will local food production help them feed their increasing population? Local food production is great when and where it makes sense. But the fact remains that feeding everyone on the planet will require an interconnected and interdependent global food system and more cooperation, not less.
Myth 4: Don’t eat that mango it was shipped from overseas!
This is another case of “it’s not so simple”. People often avoid eating products such as mangoes because they assume that shipping foods from another country has a huge greenhouse gas emissions impact. But in fact, transport emissions are on average less than 10% of the total global emissions from food and for the typical American household, transport emissions account for only about 5% of food emissions. Air-transport of food is also less than most people think, accounting for only about 0.16% of food miles. This is not to say that these emissions are not important, they are, and they need to be reduced to zero by decarbonizing the shipping industry. But avoiding that mango while driving your car to the store doesn’t make good climate sense if you are trying to reduce your total climate impact. So go ahead and make a nice, yummy mango smoothie but make sure you walk or bike to the store instead.
Myth 5: If I fly less then I can eat as much meat as I want
Frequently, sectors are pitted against each other, often to justify certain types of behavior. But both livestock production and airline travel contribute to climate change with livestock currently contributing between 10% to 15% of global emissions and airline travel between 2 to 3%. Cows emit methane, which is a more potent but shorter-lived gas, while carbon dioxide emissions from flights stay in the atmosphere for several centuries, which makes comparing them difficult. Although current emissions from both sectors are already too high, each is projected to dramatically increase its emissions in the future as more people travel and eat meat. When addressing climate change, every sector, no matter how small or large, needs to reduce current emissions and avoid any future increases to have a chance of solving the climate crises. Calling out one sector as “worse” than another only delays action and increases the risk of irreversible and catastrophic climate change. So no, you shouldn’t “flight shame” or skip that next vacation and then eat as much meat as you want. This is a Both/And situation, not an Either/Or.
Yes, eating a healthy and sustainable diet is not simple, but this isn’t an excuse to believe everything that you hear or to believe some ideas to justify lifestyle choices. A little common sense is prudent and will ensure that the best of intentions don’t end up hurting efforts to fight climate change and save biodiversity.
To learn more, please check out thePlanet-Based Diets approach and see how eating different foods will change your environmental food-print.
by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer The COVID-19 pandemic has shined a light on BIPOC communities’ systemic lack of access to healthcare and the role that environmental injustice plays in health outcomes. Now, it’s shining a light on food insecurity in some of North America’s most remote regions. Canadian non-profit Mikinakoos Children’s Fund found that the cost of getting […]
Why This Matters: In the 1980s canned tuna was a staple food found in nearly every pantry in America. But these days tuna are harder and harder to catch, as the wildly popular Netflix documentary Seaspiracy explained to many who were simply unaware of how their tuna roll or melt was impacting the ocean.
by Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer A year ago, things seemed bad for New Jersey’s oyster growers — restaurants shut down during the pandemic, hampering the oyster market, and sending farmers into a tailspin. But now, sales are back and better than ever. Scott Lennox, a founder of the Barnegat Oyster Collective, told the New York […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.