It’s the Nature Economy, Stupid

Photo: World Economic Forum

by Monica Medina and Miro Korenha

President Trump is the Climate Denier- in-Chief. He says wind turbines cause cancer (they don’t), that energy-efficient light bulbs make him look bad (what doesn’t?), we need more water to wash our dishes (that’s expensive and wasteful), and that energy-efficient building have no windows (wrong again). He promised to bring back the “good old days” of Texas oil barons like JR Ewing (or maybe the Clampetts), and he has put in place policies that prop up dying coal mines and power plants, and uses the powers of government to lend a hand to pollution-spewing oil and gas operations — all things that take us backward for sure. This week the President went even further, spinning a dystopian fairy tale saying that “eliminating carbon” use would result in the “wholesale destruction of our entire energy industry and many other industries, the economic evisceration of entire communities, and the unfettered offshoring of millions of our best jobs to foreign countries and foreign polluters.  Millions and millions of jobs would go.” He tripled down on the tired old anti-environmental trope that regulations that protect the environment kill jobs and destroy communities.

Meanwhile, former Vice President Joe Biden this week flipped the basic jobs versus the environment paradigm on its head. He argued that sustaining the natural world and combating climate change, reigning in runaway pollution and weaning the world off finite natural resources like fossil fuels are more than just compatible with economic growth. In the future, these activities will increasingly fuel our prosperity.  He is the first candidate for President in the modern era to put forward a vision of our future in truly revolutionary new strokes — not grounded in nostalgic wishes for days gone by or even fear of a climate crisis that could eventually destroy our way of life.  Ironically, Biden is not the one peddling fear to sell his vision, Trump is.

Biden released the most comprehensive climate and energy plan we’ve ever seen from a presumptive presidential nominee.  To put this in perspective, the $90 billion energy and environmental stimulus package in 2009 was HUGE at the time, bigger than anything in this field ever attempted before it.  Biden’s 2020 plan, at $2 trillion, is more than ten times bigger. And he pitched it as a transformational economic growth plan — a sweeping roadmap for job creation and economic stimulus.  As Miranda’s Hamilton would say, “The World Turned Upside Down.”

But you don’t have to take his word for the economic might of the so-called “Nature Economy.” Last week, the World Economic Forum, the organization that brings together global business leaders and economists and heads of state, issued the second of three reports on what they call “the Great Reset” — the transition towards a nature-positive economy.  According to their experts, this “is a path that can provide a win-win for nature, people and business.  It can unlock an estimated $10 trillion of business opportunities by transforming the three economic systems that are responsible for almost 80% of nature loss.”  Those economic systems are agriculture and fisheries, the built environment and infrastructure, and energy.  They see the path to prosperity as tied to changing the way people (businesses and governments) interact with nature in each of these systems.

And therein lies one of the biggest differences between Trump and Biden.  While President Trump has routinely tried to slash funding for conservation, endangered species protection, and climate action, Joe Biden knows that a habitable planet for future generations is one with healthy ecosystems and sustainable energy sources.  Biden’s vision is further exemplified in his economic development plan for rural America which is grounded in conservation and a transition to sustainable agriculture and regional food systems.

Contrast this to the Trump administration’s conduct during this time of record job loss.  While Trump bailed out the oil industry, workers got little to no relief and faced massive layoffs and permanent job losses.  And the only message coming from the White House to workers looking for a job to pay their bills was to “find something new” without any sort of policy agenda to create the jobs of the future.

Politicians who refuse to acknowledge the dangers of unabashed resource extraction and pollution are not being honest about the risks that these activities pose to our economy and future prosperity.  When federal dollars are spent propping up the fossil fuel industry it means they’re not being invested in the jobs of tomorrow.  And when these same lawmakers continue to perpetuate the false dichotomy that the environment and the economy are two separate entities in competition with one another, we lose precious time to invest in the solutions that protect our planet while putting Americans back to work.

In the end, the choice between Trump and Biden was already a no brainer.  And it was crystalized by Biden himself this week when he put it this simply: “When Donald Trump thinks about climate change, the only word he can muster is ‘hoax.’ When I think about climate change, the word I think of is ‘jobs.’” And the message to President Trump is also crystal clear: Biden’s plan is not socialism or a green disaster, “It’s the Nature Economy, Stupid.”

Up Next

Advocates Urge Texas Land Commissioner to Reroute Hurricane Harvey Relief

Advocates Urge Texas Land Commissioner to Reroute Hurricane Harvey Relief

by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer More than three years after Hurricane Harvey, officials are still clashing over how to disperse aid. In the first $1 billion round of support, Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush made some questionable calculations, leaving the hardest-hit communities in its most populous city without a penny in federal aid according to the […]

Continue Reading 601 words

Climate Protesters Held Marches All Over France on Sunday

It’s spring in Paris, they are still struggling with COVID, and yet thousands of demonstrators took to the streets in Paris and numerous other French cities to protest climate change.  The French legislature is considering a law to impose tougher measures to combat climate change, but many believe the proposals are not sufficient and so they staged marches in Nancy, Toulouse, Rennes, Lyon, Grenoble, as seen in social media posts.

Why This Matters:  Because of the Paris Agreement, France is associated with climate change progress.

Continue Reading 424 words
California to Nestlé: Stop Draining Our Water

California to Nestlé: Stop Draining Our Water

As California’s drought conditions are worsening, Nestle is pumping millions of gallons of water from the San Bernardino forest. State water officials have drafted a cease-and-desist order to force the company to stop overpumping from Strawberry Creek, which provides drinking water for about 750,000 people. 

Why This Matters: It’s not the first time other states have also tried to reign in Nestle for its water grabs.

Continue Reading 377 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.