Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Using the “cover” of the COVID-19 crisis, one of the largest healthcare product companies in the world decided to stop selling in the U.S. and Canada its “signature” talc-based baby powder product due to concerns over whether it was contaminated withtoxic asbestos that thousands of women alleged caused their ovarian cancer.The company said it will still sell the product in other markets, but chose to discontinue sales here rather than add a safety warning because they stand by the safety of the product. Sales of baby powder have been declining, but its decision is seen as “a huge concession for Johnson & Johnson, which has for more than a century promoted the powder as pure and gentle enough for babies,” The New York Times reported.
Why This Matters: This is another case of a company knowing that their product contained harmful chemicals and selling it anyway — like the oil companies that knew about the greenhouse gas effect of burning petroleum. Internal memos and reports showed that the company had been concerned for at least 50 years about the possibility of traces of asbestos in its talc as well as the links of the chemical to cancer. They now sell only corn-starched based powder instead. Good.
Many Women Complained
As of March, there were 19,400 lawsuits against J&J and the company is going to have to defend the talc’s safety — a judge in one of the pending cases will allow expert witnesses called by the plaintiff’s to testify overruling J&J’s efforts to block them. The record in the litigation so far is a mixed bag — J&J has lost some big cases but prevailed in others. The lawsuits will still go forward and it is unclear how the company’s decision to stop selling the product will impact them. The women suing the company expressed relief at the company’s decision. The asbestos issue was not going away. As we reported last October, J&J was forced to recall 33,000 bottles of baby powder in the United States after the Food and Drug Administration found trace amounts of asbestos, a known carcinogen, in samples taken from a bottle purchased online.
The Trump Administration announced last week that it has rejected the settled scientific evidence linking the pesticide chlorpyrifos to serious health problems, particularly in children. This pesticide, which is widely used on soybeans, almonds, grapes, and other crops, has been proven to harm children’s neurological development.
Why this matters: Under the false flag of transparency, EPA is putting children at greater risk.
by Amy Lupica, ODP Contributing Writer On Tuesday, the California Fish and Game Commission voted to accept a petition that will grant the Joshua tree, the famous twisty-limbed yucca plant native to the Mojave desert, endangered species status for one year while the state conducts a study. The plant is now considered a “candidate species” […]
by Razi Beresin-Scher and Miro Korenha According to recent reporting from The Hill, atmospheric smoke is exacerbating the toll of the COVID-19 virus in Oregon and California. Smoke inhalation weakens the immune systems of those suffering from asthma and other underlying respiratory conditions, compromising their ability to recover from the virus. Researchers at the Harvard […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.