Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
DoD’s PFAS Task Force issued a report in which it admitted that the number of military installations that could be contaminated with the “forever chemicals” is far greater than they previously thought — the number jumped from 401 to 651. In order to protect service members and their families and the public, the Defense Department no longer uses the flame retardant AFFF (that contains PFAS or PFOA) in land-based testing and training — it only uses it for emergency response, and it is actively looking for a replacement but research efforts so far have failed to develop an equally effective fire suppressant.
Why This Matters: DoD is continuing to document its failures and is not acting with enough urgency to address the toxic contamination at its installations, large and small across the country. This is a huge jump in numbers. But even more alarming is that the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has so far confirmed PFAS in tap water or groundwater at 328 military sites. Until recently, servicemembers and their families and people who work on these installations plus the communities near many of them continued to drink contaminated water. And, according to the EWG, many of the highest PFAS detections in the nation have been found on or near DOD installations. The military should have done better because they knew for years of the toxicity of these chemicals — they should be doing better now. This is no way to say “thank you for your service.”
“DOD officials have understood the risks of AFFF since the early 1970s, when Navy and Air Force studies first showed the firefighting foam was toxic to fish; since the early 1980s, when the Air Force conducted its own animal studies on AFFF; and since the early 2000s, when the maker of PFOS, the main ingredient in AFFF, exited the market. In 2001, a DOD memo concluded that the main ingredient in AFFF was ‘persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic.’”
As a result of their FOIA request, EWG learned that DOD has PFAS detections in groundwater at 14 installations that were above 1 million parts per trillion (ppt), which greatly exceeds the 70 ppt drinking water advisory level recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency. The cost of cleanup of the PFAS mess continues to rise — with the new locations, DoD now estimates it will cost $3 billion just to complete the first two stages of the federal government’s five-stage environmental cleanup process, McClatchy reported. Plus replacing AFFF will also be expensive due to the need to retrofit or replace military base firefighting trucks, aircraft hangars and foam systems on Navy ships, and also to remove the old foam and substitute its replacement.
To Go Deeper: Watch this Congressional testimony from a service member who lost his daughter to brain cancer he believes was related to PFAS contamination at an installation – it puts his service and that of so many others – in a new light.
By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor In another significant blow to the Pebble Mine project in Alaska, the EPA has asked a federal court to allow Clean Water Act protections for parts of Bristol Bay, a body of water that stands to be decimated if the project continues. Environmental advocates and Alaska Native tribes hope […]
By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer California’s record-breaking drought is not just a result of climate change — it’s also making climate change worse. According to a new study, population growth and energy-sapping water projects have driven up emissions and slowed down decarbonization campaigns. As it gets more and more difficult for Californians to rely […]
By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor A federal judge has thrown out a Trump administration environmental rollback that scaled back federal protections for the nation’s streams, marshes, and wetlands. Despite support from farm and business groups, the federal judge ruled that the rollback could lead to “serious environmental harm.” Environmental groups are celebrating the decision, which will reinstate protections for […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.