Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
A new study published this week in the Journal Nature found that the switch from coal-fired power plants to natural gas plants during the 11 year period from 2005-16 coincided with a huge reduction of 26,000 deaths and a significant increase in agricultural productivity nearby the plants. These changes in power plants (combined with advances in emissions controls technologies) led to much lower toxic air pollution— they “produced net reductions in SO2 and NOx of more than 80% and 60% respectively,” according to the research.
Why This Matters: These results are striking — the study found that the health benefits from fuel switching began to accrue almost immediately — the mortality rate dropped quickly. The study’s author correctly notes that natural gas also has its problems because it results in releases of methane releases that are more potent for climate change than carbon releases. But the bottom line message is clear — closing coal-fired power plants saves lives and likely also saves society overall due to lower health care and other costs. The agricultural benefits are significant as well and are a less well-studied additional benefit from reduced pollution. So let’s get on with it and close the approximately 300 remaining ones, instead of propping them up and trying to keep them going like the Trump Administration.
The Study By The Numbers
More than 330 coal-fired power ended operations in the U.S. between 2005 and 2016
The shutdown of coal-fired units saved an estimated 26,610 (5%–95% confidence intervals (CI), 2,725–49,680) lives in the immediate vicinity of those plants
“When you turn coal units off you see deaths go down. It’s something we can see in a tangible way. There is a cost to coal beyond the economics. We have to think carefully about where plants are sited, as well as how to reduce their pollutants.”
By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer President Biden announced a plan to develop seven new offshore wind farms along US coastlines. He aims to deploy 30 gigawatts of offshore wind power by 2030 — enough energy to power over 10 million homes. Why this Matters: The proposed wind projects could avert 78 million metric […]
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer A peak in fossil fuel use is expected by the middle of the decade and according to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) latest annual World Energy Outlook report:There’s still a clean energy gap when it comes to limiting global temperature rise. Released in the lead up to the COP26 […]
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Gas is the largest energy source in the US. Gas stoves aren’t the largest consumer of natural gas in any home, but they’ve become “a focal point in the fight over whether gas should even exist” as an energy source in people’s residences. Burning gas, especially without ventilation like […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.