Newark Offers Bottled Water to Address Water Crisis, Residents Grow Weary

Image: Andrew Maclean/NJ Advance Media for

After it was determined that the 40,000 filters Newark city officials gave out to residents to address the ongoing water crisis weren’t actually filtering out lead, the city decided to begin distributing bottled water. In a startling echo of Flint, residents of Newark have been kept in the dark about the safety of their drinking water. Last Friday the EPA sent a letter to Newark mayor Ras Baraka and Catherine McCabe, the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, pressing that it was “essential” to warn residents not to rely on issued water filters.

Residents Fed Up: While only some residents are eligible for bottled water, others received robo calls informing them to come pick up bottled water only to be turned away when their address wasn’t on the list. Other residents had to wait in line for 2 hours just to get water and are understandably fed up and want to be able to trust the water coming out of their taps. As one resident named Sandra explained to NJ online, “It’s terrible. We’ve got to stand in line for a natural resource that should be free for everybody. We can’t drink it, we can’t wash in it and we still got to pay for it.”

Cry for Help: The city of Newark as well as the state of New Jersey have limited resources and said it’s unclear for how long they would be able to distribute water. Catherine McCabe explained that “EPA has not offered any support in providing bottled water to the city or in distributing that bottled water,” adding in a letter to the federal agency that “Given the concerns EPA has here, we hope that EPA will offer assistance promptly.” Additionally, Mayor Baraka said it would cost about $70 million to replace lead service lines in Newark and is also asking the federal government to help with this cost.

What’s Being Done: As explained, “Newark began a new corrosion control treatment that coats old lead pipes and prevents them from dissolving lead into the water. The treatment is expected to take months to be fully effective and city officials have urged residents to continue flushing the water to make sure the chemical runs through the water supply.” But aging infrastructure can only serve its function for so long, eventually, pipes will need to be replaced.

In the Dark: The New York Times reported that Newark’s residents were being given accurate information about their drinking water? “For nearly a year and a half after high lead levels were first discovered in the water system, Mr. Baraka and other officials blamed aging lead pipes, insisting on the city’s website that the water was “absolutely safe to drink.” But Newark changed course after a study found that lead was leaching into the water because of ineffective corrosion treatment at the city’s Pequannock plant.”

Why This Matters: There is no safe level of lead in drinking water and children can be especially affected by lead contamination. Unfortunately, lead in America’s water is a widespread national problem that needs to be addressed at the root cause. Our national infrastructure is decaying and until lawmakers address this fact and prioritize the needs of frontline communities, buying bottled water is merely an inefficient band-aid to a really big problem facing Americans. Access to clean drinking water should be a human right and certainly one that the wealthiest nation on earth can provide for its citizens.

Up Next

EPA Proposes New Rules for Getting Lead Out of Drinking Water – More Slowly

EPA Proposes New Rules for Getting Lead Out of Drinking Water – More Slowly

The Trump administration — after years of promising and more than 9 years of work by EPA — finally issued a proposed rule on lead in drinking water that does not require the removal of the estimated 6 million or more lead service lines that remain underground throughout the nation, and in fact, it doubles the amount of time allotted to replace lead pipes in water systems that contain high levels of lead.

Why This Matters:  They may try to put lipstick on this pig (sorry for the old pun), and it could have been worse, but when the Trump Administration brags that they put this rule in place, the question should be why did they not do more? This proposed rule is hardly sufficient to deal with the scope and the harm caused by lead in drinking water in this nation. 

Continue Reading 438 words
7.5 Million Californians Affected by Toxic Chemicals in Drinking Water

7.5 Million Californians Affected by Toxic Chemicals in Drinking Water

A recent study by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that 74 community water systems in California, which serve 7.5 million people, were contaminated with toxic fluorinated chemicals known as PFAS between 2013 and 2019. Why This Matters: The chemical companies that have made these chemicals for use in their products (like DuPont and 3M) largely pass along the cleanup costs of water sources onto municipalities and taxpayers.


Continue Reading 414 words
Water Crisis Deepens in Zimbabwe – 2 Million People’s Supply Cut Off

Water Crisis Deepens in Zimbabwe – 2 Million People’s Supply Cut Off

CBS News and CNN are reporting that because of a major drought in Zimbabwe that occurred for months, more than 2 million residents of Zimbabwe’s capital and surrounding towns were without tap water on Tuesday because city officials had to shut down the city’s main treatment plant — they do not have the money to […]

Continue Reading 406 words