Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
E&E News led with a story yesterday about the numerous environmental groups that received government support under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) even as they were suing the government over policies they believed the Trump administration got wrong. The story noted that the loans to environmental groups “represent a tiny fraction of the $660 billion that has gone to 4.9 million businesses through the paycheck program that Congress created….” On Tuesday, Climate Power 2020 looked at the PPP and it put out a statement about its findings that “[m]ore than 200 fossil fuel companies received between $116.4 million and $272 million in Paycheck Protection Plan loans while reporting that they retained zero employees with the COVID-19 emergency relief funds…” — oil and gas companies reaped $8B in total.
Why This Matters: The E&E story seems to imply that environmental groups should not be suing the Trump administration — they sought comments from numerous groups asking why they were taking the money while continuing to file lawsuits. Meanwhile, the oil and gas companies took much more from the fund and did not retain their employees, which totally frustrates the purpose of the PPP and appears to waste taxpayer dollars. Recipients of PPP funds should not have to bow to politics, but they should be held accountable for waste and fraud.
What The Groups Said About Their PPP Loans
Thomas Frank of E&E News wrote that the “environmental groups that took federal money were small to midsize nonprofits with annual budgets ranging from a few million dollars to about $50 million.” He asked Jamie Clark, the CEO of Defenders of Wildlife about the organization’s PPP loan, after pointing out that they had sued the Trump Administration on May 12 about the environmental issues with the Border Wall, and nine days later took a PPP loan of between $2m and $5m. She said in a statement “We feel no obligation to the Trump administration because we obtained a loan through a program authorized by Congress to help employers retain their staff,” and continued, “Anyone who knows Defenders knows we would never pull our punches in fighting the Trump administration’s damaging and misguided policies for wildlife and public lands.” Another organization, Friends of the Earth, told E&E News it took a loan worth $1 million to $2 million to “secure staff salaries during the COVID pandemic so that we can continue to hold the Trump administration accountable for its attacks on the environment, or Democrats accountable for not boldly leading on environmental issues.”
Oil and Gas PPP Loans
According to Climate Power 2020, 4,800 fossil fuel companies received between $2.5 billion and $6 billion in Paycheck Protection Plan loans, according to data released by the Trump administration. More than 400 fossil fuel companies received at least $2 million in loans. Worse yet, 212 companies reported to the government that they retained zero employees with the funds. The same was true with CARES Act funds. Climate Power 2020 argues that when it comes to COVID assistance, President Trump has prioritized helping the fossil fuel industry; including, more than $2 billion in additional taxpayer-funded bailouts going to 40 big oil and gas companies through the CARES Act. Thus, between PPP and CARES Act funds, the total of known oil and gas handouts was more than $8 billion. “It’s clear where President Trump’s priorities lie, and it’s not with working Americans,” said Lori Lodes, Executive Director of Climate Power 2020. “The billions of dollars in taxpayer money handed out to fossil fuel companies during this pandemic, some of which reported zero employees retained, raises serious questions that the Trump administration must answer.”
by Kate Cullen “A bipartisan coalition in the U.S. Congress pushes for an economic stimulus that dramatically scales-up the transition to a net zero emissions” Today, this feels like an unthinkable headline, but after working on these issues in the U.K., I’ve come to believe that bipartisan action to decarbonizing the U.S. economy may not […]
It’s the time of year that Congress passes funding bills for agencies and this year’s mashup of bills — known as a “minibus” because it only funds some parts of the government — is chock full of environmental provisions intended to reverse Trump rollbacks, take actions the Administration has blocked, and to prevent them from taking others.
With hurricane season about to enter its peak, The Hill reported that six Democratic Senators demanded that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) provide them assurances that they will put tougher rules in place to prevent another “Sharpie-gate” from interfering with the work of the weather and climate scientists at the agency.
Why This Matters: Dems are right to demand that there will be no political interference with agency forecasts during this hurricane season — the public’s safety must be paramount.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.