Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
The House is expected to pass legislation this week that would require the Environmental Protection Agency to set standards to limit the amount of toxic fluorinated chemicals (known collectively as PFAS or forever chemicals because they do not break down) that can safely be found in drinking water. But regardless of what Congress does, and the Senate is unlikely to pass the House bill according to a leading Republican late last night, the White House said in a statement that the President would veto any legislation because it would “bypass well-established processes, procedures, and legal requirements of the Nation’s most fundamental environmental laws….”
Why This Matters: So much for crystal clear waters. The administration had promised that EPA would issue new regulations creating limits on PFAS contamination in rivers and drinking water by the end of 2019, but they failed to do so. The President prefers to keep his promises to industry, which lobbied the White House and Republican Members of Congress against requiring water utilities and other companies from having to install technology to remove PFAS from their outflows. Of course — it is always about what industry needs — forget the thousands of service members and their families on military installations and the 1400 communities with PFAS contaminating their water systems. Not to mention that it is found in the drinking water of nearly 1 in 3 Americans.
EPA’s Failure to Regulate PFAS
The EPA, according to the Environmental Working Group, has long ignored the PFAS problem — it first learned from 3M Company in 1998 that these chemicals are toxic, and in 2001 the Company shared with the agency internal studies documenting the health risks associated with PFAS chemicals. In 2006 EPA’s Science Advisory Board found that PFOA was a likely human carcinogen, but still, no regulations were issued — only guidance, which it issued it issued in 2009 and established a provisional health advisory for the chemicals. The current guidance for PFAS is no more than 70 parts per trillion of PFAS in water, but Democrats and public health groups say a lower standard is needed to protect public health. For example, the state of New Hampshire is currently fighting to impose a standard of 12 parts per trillion (ppt) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), 15 ppt for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), 18 ppt for perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxs), and 11 ppt for perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA).
Why This Matters: Rivers are often touted as an environmentally friendly and cheap mode of transportation – even here in the U.S. (e.g., the Mississippi River). But there are many other users who rely on these waterways in India for fishing and other livelihoods.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.