Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
The oldest national park in Kenya is “under immense pressure,” Dr. Patrick Omondi, the director of biodiversity, research, and planning at the Kenya Wildlife Service, told The Guardian. As Peter Muiruri reported, because of “dwindling wildlife and visitor numbers, and increasing industry and human settlements on all sides,” the Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS) has made a 10-year plan to build fences in the south end of the Nairobi National Park.
Why This Matters: This plan has ignited a new battle between the government and conservation groups. Many conservation groups claim that the government is not paying attention to the needs of communities in the surrounding areas. Indeed, as many of these community members have argued, these fences would “separate [the] community from the animals within the Nairobi ecosystem.” In the words of William Ole Kompe, a Maasai elder, said, “There will be no fencing on our side…We have lived together with wild animals forever. Why separate us now?”
The Decline of the Park: The park was created in 1946, when Kenya was under British colonial rule. According to The Guardian, this 45-square mile park is the “only sanctuary in the world where wild animals roam freely next to a bustling metropolis.” However, in recent years, the park’s condition has deteriorated. Some species there have declined over 70% in the past 40 years, and the wildebeest migration has “collapsed.”
As Reuters explained, “the park has been fenced in on three sides as the city mushroomed around it.”
Looking Forward: What will happen if this proposal does get put into action? Many have already suggested their commitment to protesting the measures. William Ole Kompe promised “If [fencing] happens, I will lead a street demonstration to oppose the move.” Others have raised further problems with the plan. For instance, as Nkamunu Patita, a coordinator at the Wildlife Foundation who was born and raised in the surrounding areas, has said “If the river is fenced in, the community will be unable to make use of the water, while fencing it out means the water will not be accessible to animals within the park.” As Patita emphasizes, there must be more consultations, studies, and community discussions before this plan is put into place.
by Natasha Lasky, ODP Contributing Writer A study published yesterday in the journal Nature suggests that revitalizing ecosystems in a global, holistic way could be an immensely effective way to heal the Earth’s climate. In particular, forests, wetlands, and grasslands would benefit most from restoration — protecting just 30% of these priority areas could save […]
Why This Matters: As President Trump bleeds money from the military to build the border wall (which fortunately a federal court just put on hold), climate change — a real emergency for the military — goes unaddressed.
Last week, California Governor Gavin Newsom enacted an executive order committing California to conserve 30% of its land and waters by 2030. This order compels California’s Natural Resource Agency to work with other state agencies to establish the California Biodiversity Collaborative which will then work with Native American tribes and other stakeholders to create a […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.