Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
In the United States, agriculture accounts for 10% of overall greenhouse gas emissions in addition to other pollution issues. Yet as Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, said during his confirmation hearing, “I think agriculture is probably the first and best way to begin getting some wins in this climate area,” a commitment that President Biden also holds.
However, as the Thompson Reuters Foundation explained, the Biden administration will need to persuade farmers, most of whom do not support him politically, of the benefits of making shifts to more climate-friendly farming practices.
According to a poll last October by the trade publication Farm Journal, 85% of 1,311 farmers surveyed suggested they would vote for Trump, who had no national plan to deal with climate change.
Why This Matters: As Greenbiz wrote last year, it’s no secret it’s been difficult to get farmers to adopt regenerative agriculture practices. Many farmers’ barrier to adopting regenerative practices is the costs are obvious, while the benefits can feel vague, confusing, and far-off. Breaking these barriers and creating incentives and support for farmers to switch to more climate-friendly practices is a top priority for the Biden administration. But farmers are beginning to weigh their options, especially as climate change increasingly impacts their crops.
The Biden Admin’s Commitment: President Biden pledged to expand and fortify the Conservation Stewardship Program, which supports farm income through payments based on farmers’ practices to protect the environment, including carbon sequestration.
Additionally, the USDA could potentially set up a carbon bank funded by the Commodity Credit Corporation.
Farmers can also, with the help of the government, begin reducing their carbon intensity through regenerative and more efficient farming practices as well as incorporating renewable energy in their operations.
Why Isn’t There More of This Type of Farming?
Firstly, not every farmer has the knowledge and support to begin a regenerative farm, explained Michael Heller, who helps run the Maryland Grazers Network–a mentorship program that pairs experienced livestock, dairy, sheep, and poultry producers with farmers who want to learn new grazing skills. This network was the inspiration behind a recently formed regional group called the Mountains-to-Bay Grazing Alliance composed of grazing groups in MD, VA, PA, and WV. The hope is that more states develop similar programs. Mentorship programs like this are limited and not available to all farmers interested in diversifying their farming practices.
Secondly, federal farm subsidies run against small farmers. Vegetable farmers don’t get subsidies, and those looking to turn to regenerative farming have limited resources to make the switch—USDA’s SARE grants aren’t close to being funded well enough to promote regenerative farming on a large scale.
Lastly, in our society, farmers are rewarded by yield and not so much by the eco-friendly methods used to grow produce and raise sustainable livestock. We must create more financial incentives for farmers to shift to this way of farming–which is something a carbon bank and expanded markets for regenerative farming can bring.
by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer The Department of the Interior announced Friday that it will use funds allocated by a conservation bill passed last year to fund 165 national park improvement projects that will create nearly 19,000 jobs. The Biden administration has pledged to protect 30% of public lands and waters by 2030, but accomplishing that means completing deferred maintenance […]
The Federal Emergency Management Agency announced late last week a new pricing structure for its federal flood insurance program. The federal government has been subsidizing flood insurance for people in areas defined by the government as flood-prone — the new pricing takes into account the actual risk to people’s homes.
Why This Matters: The prior system was inequitable and FEMA says its new system will mean that low-income people with less valuable homes will pay only their fair share.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.