Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Those exposed to DDT before it was banned first-hand saw increased rates of breast cancer; subsequently, their children experienced higher rates of obesity, birth defects, reduced fertility, and testicular cancer in sons.
Now, scientists at UC Davis and the Public Health Institute in Oakland say DDT has leaped one more generation.
Why This Matters: Silent Spring, released in 1962 by Rachel Carson, originally documented DDT’s harm to ecosystems. The pesticide, designed to kill many species of insects at once, permeated the water and land, leading to defects, infertility, and death in hundreds of species. That the chemical still impacts the grandchildren of human victims implies that hundreds of species and habitats may be suffering similar generational consequences and that the battle against DDT is far from over.
As we begin Earth Week, it’s a reminder that the fight for our planet is ongoing and just as necessary today as it was when Rachel Carson began raising awareness about the dangers of chemicals through her research.
Dangerous DDT: “This is something that people had always thought was possible,” said Barbara Cohn, director of the Public Health Institute’s Child Health and Development Studies, “but there had never been a human study to support the existence of that link.” The latest study found that a grandmother’s exposure to DDT could put granddaughters at a higher risk of obesity and early menstrual onset, increasing the risk of breast cancer, high blood pressure, diabetes, and other diseases. The results come from a longitudinal study that has followed more than 15,000 pregnant women and their descendants since 1959.
One unique element of these studies is that the consequences of DDT use 50 years ago are still coming out generation by generation. Each pregnant woman in the survey provided samples to evaluate the presence of DDT, but until their children are at a certain age, it can be challenging to say for sure if they, too, have been affected. These new findings come from the evaluation of women now in their 20s and 30s. “Even though we banned that stuff more than 40 years ago, people now walking the Earth — the granddaughters of those who were pregnant — were exposed,” said Cohn. She says that the public health community should take this as a cautionary tale and not wait for longitudinal results before deciding to practice restraint.
“It’s the full meaning of what a ‘forever chemical’ is — in some ways, that makes every chemical potentially ‘forever’ if it has the potential to do this,” said Cohn. Julia Brody, executive director at the Silent Spring Institute, agrees, “we don’t want to wait the next three generations to find out the chemicals that are in use now cause breast cancer.”
One way to hunt down which chemicals may have generational impacts on humans is to evaluate smaller animals with shorter life cycles. Researchers hope that by identifying endocrine disruptors in other species, they can determine what chemicals contribute to early menstrual periods, obesity, cancer, and more.
Researchers hope that many future generations will choose to participate in the study, and for many descendants, the findings bring answers and closure. Akilah Shahid, 30, said that knowing her family was a part of the study made things click. “How many times have we talked about climate change and things that we need to do better for our children and grandchildren? This is more proof that hello, what we do today is going to affect people way forward,” she said. “I hope this is a wake-up call for a lot of people because we’re talking about saving the environment again, today, for our future generations.”
EPA’s acting chief of enforcement sent a memo to staff last week (that The Hill obtained) calling for them to “[s]trengthen enforcement in overburdened communities by resolving environmental noncompliance through remedies with tangible benefits for the community” with a particular emphasis on “cornerstone environmental statutes.”
Why This Matters: The Biden administration can immediately make progress correcting environmental injustice through fair and strong enforcement of current laws
A long battle over the use of a bug-killing pesticide linked to brain damage in children may be coming to an end. In a ruling last week, a federal appeals court gave the Environmental Protection Agency 60 days to ban the pesticide chlorpyrifos, commonly used on oranges, almonds, and other crops — or prove there’s a safe use of the chemical.
Why This Matters: The pesticide industry used the same playbook as with PFAS, tobacco, and oil: raisedoubt about the clear science and prevent immediate action from being taken, to the harm of everyone else.
By Azzedine Downes As we emerge from a year of lockdowns and begin to “build back better,” it is more important than ever to remember what we’ve learned. The pandemic has shown us the fragility of our economy and how reliant it is on our health. For without health, we potentially have nothing. COVID 19 […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.