Saving Biodiversity Boosts Global Output by Tens to Hundreds of Billions Annually

Photo: Campaign for Nature

A new study by leading economists and scientists released yesterday makes a strong case for conserving at least 30% of the planet.  The study clearly demonstrates that investing in nature as opposed to using it up yields significantly better economic results as well as saving money that would otherwise be spent on the impacts of climate change and biodiversity loss.  The report’s authors found that the additional environmental protections needed to achieve the 30% would lead to an average of $250 billion in increased economic output annually.  When you factor in the non-monetary benefits, conserving 30% of the planet’s benefits outweigh the costs by 5:1.  The report describes a new economic sector comprised of conserving and restoring nature that post-pandemic will grow 4-6% per year as compared to less than 1% for agriculture, timber, and fisheries.

Why This Matters:  Since it is TBT I (Monica) will harken back to 1992’s political mantra — “it’s the economy, stupid.”  Of course we “value” nature for the enjoyment we receive from it.  But it turns out nature has monetary value too.  Not just the immediate value we get from mining it or cutting it or catching it and using it once like it was single-use plastic.  Conserving a large amount of it is actually better for the bottom line.

What Does Conserving 30% Cost?

To get these benefits from nature we must invest in it — spend money conserving it — or we won’t see returns.  For example, today, we collectively spend $24.3 billion is currently spent annually to create and maintain protected areas.  But the need is much greater — it is estimated at $68 billion – and the shortfall is greatest in developing countries with the least ability to pay. The proper investment to get the maximum benefit from 30% protected is estimated at $140B annually, which is more than 5 times what we spend now.  But, but, but — it is only a fraction of what governments spend subsidizing extractive uses.  In fact, the authors calculate that government subsidies currently directed toward activities that destroy nature are three times higher than what is it would cost to achieve 30% of nature protected. And like any investment, it will take a few years to receive the dividends but the costs would be more than offset over time.  The natural areas that remain to be conserved are located in great part on the lands/waters of indigenous peoples or in low/middle-income countries.  Wealthier nations would need to bear a greater financial burden for the up-front investments required even if it does not involve their lands and waters directly.

To Go Deeper: You can read the report’s highlights here and the full report here.

Up Next

Climate Change Impacts Roads, May Make Traffic Worse Unless We Adapt Them

Climate Change Impacts Roads, May Make Traffic Worse Unless We Adapt Them

Climate change will impact roads, bridges and other transportation infrastructure in ways you may not have realized, writes Matt Alderton in The Washington Post over the weekend.  Infrastructure is built to withstand certain weather conditions and extremes: “the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials has guidelines that say asphalt should be engineered to withstand the hottest week on record during a certain historical period — say, 1970 and 2000.”

Why This Matters:  We need to adapt our roads to withstand future conditions, otherwise drivers will experience much worse road conditions and traffic, not to mention the huge expense for taxpayers for repairs due to ineffective design.

Continue Reading 567 words
Why Equitable, Clean Transportation is Key to a Sustainable Economic Recovery

Why Equitable, Clean Transportation is Key to a Sustainable Economic Recovery

By Julia Pyper, host/producer Political Climate As Congress looks toward the next coronavirus relief package, a growing number of stakeholders from across the political spectrum are calling for a comprehensive clean energy infrastructure plan to address the nation’s economic challenges. Updating America’s transportation system offers a ripe opportunity to create jobs while lowering carbon emissions. […]

Continue Reading 834 words
Apple and Microsoft Take Big Aim at Carbon Neutrality

Apple and Microsoft Take Big Aim at Carbon Neutrality

Yesterday, Microsoft announced that it will be teaming up with Unilever, Starbucks, Mercedes-Benz, Nike, and four other companies to form Transform to Net Zero, an initiative focused on achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. As CNET reported, the team will work with the Environmental Defense Fund to share information on the best practices for decreasing carbon […]

Continue Reading 437 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.