Saving Biodiversity Boosts Global Output by Tens to Hundreds of Billions Annually

Photo: Campaign for Nature

A new study by leading economists and scientists released yesterday makes a strong case for conserving at least 30% of the planet.  The study clearly demonstrates that investing in nature as opposed to using it up yields significantly better economic results as well as saving money that would otherwise be spent on the impacts of climate change and biodiversity loss.  The report’s authors found that the additional environmental protections needed to achieve the 30% would lead to an average of $250 billion in increased economic output annually.  When you factor in the non-monetary benefits, conserving 30% of the planet’s benefits outweigh the costs by 5:1.  The report describes a new economic sector comprised of conserving and restoring nature that post-pandemic will grow 4-6% per year as compared to less than 1% for agriculture, timber, and fisheries.

Why This Matters:  Since it is TBT I (Monica) will harken back to 1992’s political mantra — “it’s the economy, stupid.”  Of course we “value” nature for the enjoyment we receive from it.  But it turns out nature has monetary value too.  Not just the immediate value we get from mining it or cutting it or catching it and using it once like it was single-use plastic.  Conserving a large amount of it is actually better for the bottom line.

What Does Conserving 30% Cost?

To get these benefits from nature we must invest in it — spend money conserving it — or we won’t see returns.  For example, today, we collectively spend $24.3 billion is currently spent annually to create and maintain protected areas.  But the need is much greater — it is estimated at $68 billion – and the shortfall is greatest in developing countries with the least ability to pay. The proper investment to get the maximum benefit from 30% protected is estimated at $140B annually, which is more than 5 times what we spend now.  But, but, but — it is only a fraction of what governments spend subsidizing extractive uses.  In fact, the authors calculate that government subsidies currently directed toward activities that destroy nature are three times higher than what is it would cost to achieve 30% of nature protected. And like any investment, it will take a few years to receive the dividends but the costs would be more than offset over time.  The natural areas that remain to be conserved are located in great part on the lands/waters of indigenous peoples or in low/middle-income countries.  Wealthier nations would need to bear a greater financial burden for the up-front investments required even if it does not involve their lands and waters directly.

To Go Deeper: You can read the report’s highlights here and the full report here.

Up Next

One Cool Thing: Get on Your E-Bikes and Ride

One Cool Thing: Get on Your E-Bikes and Ride

Bike riders and commuters across the nation will be getting some special benefits for purchasing an electric bicycle. Included in President Biden’s $3.5 trillion budget plan is $7.4 billion in tax credits for e-bike purchases. The administration hopes that it can encourage more people to choose biking instead of driving to help curb transportation emissions, […]

Continue Reading 135 words
California Bill Aims to Clarify Recycling Symbols

California Bill Aims to Clarify Recycling Symbols

By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Those three arrows in a triangle are an easy shorthand for recyclables, but there’s one problem:  just because the symbol is printed on a product, doesn’t necessarily mean the item is recyclable. It simply informs consumers of the type of plastic used based on the number within the arrows. […]

Continue Reading 391 words
One Cool Thing: Think Outside the Sauce

One Cool Thing: Think Outside the Sauce

“Recycling just got saucy.” Taco Bell has announced that it’s teaming up with recycling firm TerraCycle to keep its iconic sauce packets out of landfills. The company says that more than 8 billion of their spicy sauce packets end up in landfills each year, but with this new partnership, those friendly packets can become something […]

Continue Reading 139 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.