Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
The Washington Post’s Pulitzer Prize-winning series on climate change highlighting the places where temperatures have already warmed more than 2 degrees has a new installment, this one focusing on how to retain tree cover in Northern Minnesota so it doesn’t become a prairie, which scientists believe is a real risk. If Minnesota’s residents want to keep their forests, humans must limit greenhouse gas emissions, but even so, scientists are looking for ways to help the state’s forests adapt by changing them from spruce and fir trees to maples and oaks.
Why This Matters: Change is inevitable, but climate change is moving so fast that without aggressive action to plant new trees, the risk is that the boreal forest will die and the areas will become an extension of the state’s prairie land unless we do something. This may mean planting millions of trees of new varieties there. When faced with the drought-induced dustbowl throughout the plains in which the soil literally blew away, President Roosevelt hired unemployed workers during the Depression to plant 220 million trees. It helped. President Trump has also promised to plant a trillion trees. But will they?
Minnesota Could Be the New Kansas
The Post’s series is obviously excellent. But what makes it so remarkable is the analysis they did of historical temperature data to figure out what parts of the world are warming fastest — have already reached the seminal 2 degrees warmer. In the U.S., they found that “seven counties in Minnesota have warmed more than 2 degrees Celsius since the late 19th century — about twice the global average. Winters here have warmed even faster, with 59 of the state’s counties — about two thirds — eclipsing the 2C threshold during the months of December through February.”
What makes Minnesota special is the diversity of its landscape — from “boreal forests to the north, with their stately conifers and the moose and lynx that roam them; temperate forests in the middle, dominated by deciduous trees such as oak and maple; and prairie stretching to the south and west.” Climate change is pushing everything north and experts in the state “have testified about what is in store if temperatures continue to rise: more heat-related deaths, lower crop yields, damaging deluges and floods, a surge in pests, increasing drought and worsening air quality.” The Director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Forest Ecology told The Post that by 2100, Minnesota could lose its timber and tourism industries that are part of its identity. “Minnesota could become the new Kansas,” he said. “We have a perfectly good Kansas now. We don’t need a second one in Minnesota.”
Northwoods of the Future
Scientists are already seeing the impact of climate change in the Minnesota boreal forests. There are larger trees but on the forest floor, no new trees are filling in beneath them. According to Chris Swanston, a U.S. Forest Service ecologist and director of the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science, “[t]he forest can’t perpetuate itself the way it once did…Forests are always evolving….It’s just with climate change, things are changing faster and in different ways. We’re having to roll with that change a lot faster and be a much more active part of it.”
A recent study published in Science found that a significant percentage of beef and soy exported from Brazil to the EU is connected with illegal deforestation.As YaleE360 reported that “as much as 22 percent of soy and 60 percent of beef…back to illegal tree felling and fires in the Amazon and Cerrado regions.”
Why This Matters: The study’s lead author Raoni Rajão said, “Until now, agribusiness and the Brazilian government have claimed that they cannot monitor the entire supply chain, nor distinguish the legal from the illegal deforestation.” This new study undercuts that idea, showing that Brazil can (and must) monitor agribusiness’ connections to illegal deforestation.
As the World Economic Forum recently wrote, miniature urban forests (often no bigger than a tennis court) planted using a method invented by a Japanese botanist in the 1970s are growing in popularity. Known as “Miyawaki” forests, these dense groups of trees are bursting with biodiversity and grow more quickly and absorb more CO2 than […]
By Julia Fine A new study published this month by Jennifer A. Devine et al. found that in Guatemala’s Maya Biosphere Reserve, forests governed via community-based resource management are more resilient to narco-deforestation than state-run parks. As Fred Pearce reported in Yale Environment 360, the study calculated that up to 87% of the deforestation was […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.