Study Finds that Nations Under-Measured Global Emissions by 5.5 Billion Tons

by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer

On the heels of President Biden’s Earth Day climate summit, scientists have identified a 5.5-billion-ton discrepancy in global carbon emissions counts. This gap is roughly as large as the annual emissions of the United States and threatens to disrupt carbon emissions reductions goals worldwide. But how did the world’s nations undercount emissions by so much? Experts say that inconsistent measuring and reporting methods are most likely to blame, along with some serious exaggeration.

Why This Matters: Nearly every nation in the world has presented a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) for the Paris Climate Agreement–and many have made commitments to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Experts say that meeting these goals is crucial to preventing catastrophic temperature rise. But even as nations rally, deforestation and ocean acidification have increased, destroying essential carbon sinks. Accurately counting emissions while tracking carbon sequestration is complex and may not always provide the best optics for governments. But if countries fail to measure emissions, the world risks painfully undershooting its emissions targets.

Counting Trees: Christopher Williams, a forest expert at Clark University, says that this study “draws attention to something that has concerned many of us for quite a while — that our national greenhouse gas inventory reporting is not designed to measure and monitor true mitigation.” 

Williams explains that this discrepancy can be traced back to some U.N. reporting rules surrounding “managed land” like national parks and regions with intensive forestry. These rules require countries to report how human activity impacts carbon emissions or sequestration from this land. But indirect factors, like atmospheric carbon stimulating forest growth, can be difficult to measure and separate from direct impacts. This challenge has led countries to create their own individual measurements, and emissions impacts of “managed land” can be very inconsistent from country to country. Giacomo Grassi, a forest expert at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre and lead author of the study, explains that independent energy system modelers use one technique to measure emissions. Still, a country’s own scientist may use another.

Additionally, by reporting these indirect impacts, countries can take credit for indirect improvements rather than intentional policy or action. “There will be some policy and management in there, but a lot of it is going to be a free lunch,” said Glen Peters, research director of the Center for International Climate Research in Oslo. By counting carbon sinks, some countries can claim net-zero without implementing policies to prevent accelerating emissions which could harm their carbon sinks and lead to an emissions crisis in the future. But Grassi says there is an easy fix. Simply adjusting and standardizing measurement methods could help countries more accurately measure their direct emissions and reductions. “In the absence of these adjustments,” the study states, “collective progress would appear to be more on track than it actually is.”

Up Next

US Green Diplomat Previews Glasgow

US Green Diplomat Previews Glasgow

By WW0 Staff For the United States, the post-Trump, pre-COP26 road to Glasgow has been paved with ambition and humility. In a major speech, the President’s Envoy, John Kerry, previewed the results of his climate diplomacy before heading into two weeks of intense deliberations of world leaders. Speaking at the London School of Economics — […]

Continue Reading 421 words
One Cool Thing: COP26 Coverage Kickoff

One Cool Thing: COP26 Coverage Kickoff

Next week, the COP26 climate conference in Glasgow will draw hundreds of world leaders to Glasgow to determine the path forward five years after the Paris Climate Agreement (for a primer, read this) as new science underscores the urgency. The conference aims to squeeze countries to strengthen the commitments they’ve made towards securing global net-zero […]

Continue Reading 194 words
DOD Says Climate Change Increases National Security Risks

DOD Says Climate Change Increases National Security Risks

By Amy Lupica, ODP Daily Editor In a report released last week, the Department of Defense (DOD) confirmed that existing risks and security challenges in the US are being made worse due to “increasing temperatures; changing precipitation patterns; and more frequent, intense, and unpredictable extreme weather conditions caused by climate change. Now, the Pentagon is […]

Continue Reading 440 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.