Supporting Our Living Planet

Arctic Skua (Stercorarius parasiticus), Svalbard. Image:© Mikhail Cherkasov/WWF-Russia

The World Wildlife Fund’s recently released 2020 Living Planet report made one thing clear: the past 50 years have been an unsustainable path for biodiversity. Humans need nature, and the costs of ignoring the staggering loss of global wildlife populations (68% since 1970) are immense for our wellbeing and for that of our planet. To put this into greater context, we’re featuring a piece written by  Sheila Bonini, Senior Vice President of Private Sector Engagement at the World Wildlife Fund that was originally featured in WWF’s Sustainability Works. 

 

Over the past ten months, COVID-19 has underscored the ways in which our relationship with nature—in all its forms—is fundamentally broken.

This presents significant risks for business and finance, as they are inextricably linked. Structural issues that have compounded over time can no longer be pushed aside, or left to tackle at a later date. Collectively, we must turn our attention towards the health of our environment, and work to create a “nature-positive” economy.

Global trade and economic growth over the last half century have driven huge improvements in health and living standards, but also undermined the stability of the Earth’s natural systems, and exacerbated global inequality.

The 2020 Living Planet Report shows that global populations of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and fish have declined an average 68% in less than half a century (from 1970 to 2016). The main cause of this precipitous decline? Habitat loss and degradation, including deforestation, driven by how we as humans use and consume food and other resources.

Nature is the foundation upon which industry and enterprise rest, but we are using up “natural capital” and degrading natural systems faster than nature can replenish and restore them. In doing so, we are overshooting Earth’s overall biocapacity by 58% (according to Ecological Footprinting).

In total, a staggering $44 trillion in annual economic value generation—over half the world’s GDP—is moderately or highly dependent on nature.

Construction, agriculture, and food/beverages represent the three largest sectors that are highly dependent on nature. They rely on either direct extraction of resources from forests and oceans, or “ecosystem services” such as healthy soils, clean water, pollination, pest control, and a stable climate—all of which comes at a significant cost.

Almost every sector is dependent on nature, and exposed to nature-related risk in some capacity. They must reckon with the potential loss of customers, markets or finance, and might suffer the impacts of nature loss through the disruption of societies and markets.

There are, however, impactful measures that can be taken to mitigate this.

Conservation is critical but it’s not enough. We also need to transform how we use and consume food and other commodities. With unprecedented and immediate action, we can restore nature. This will be one of the biggest challenges to overcome in the 21st century, and among the most critical.

Instead of continuing to destroy forests, savannahs and grasslands, agriculture could use and restore degraded land, and protect vital ecosystem services (such as pest control and pollination).

Scenario modelling done by the Bending the Curve initiative shows it is not too late to end nature loss and feed a growing population—but only by immediately combining ambitious conservation efforts with the transformation of modern food production systems and consumption patterns.

Transitioning systems including food, land and ocean use towards a “nature-positive” economy—through ecosystem restoration, regenerative agriculture, and circular business models—will cost $2.7 trillion a year. It will also generate $10.1 trillion in annual business value, and create 395 million jobs by 2030.

Forward-thinking companies and investors can further safeguard their futures by making commitments, taking action, and calling for change.

They can commit to protecting nature and natural systems, by setting ambitious greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets and joining the Science Based Targets network. They can invest in nature-based solutions to minimize environmental impacts, stop land conversion and deforestation, and increase supply chain resilience

Working together, business and finance, government, and civil society can meaningfully reverse the environmental damage that has been wrought, and forge a resilient path forward.

Up Next

One Cool Thing: Where’s Walrus?

One Cool Thing: Where’s Walrus?

Do you have a good eye? Are you surprisingly good at Where’s Waldo and like Walruses? If so, we have great opportunity for you! The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is seeking volunteers to help count Atlantic walruses…from space.   Sea ice is retreating fast as global temperatures rise, forcing walruses to crowd on smaller floes […]

Continue Reading 174 words
China Pledges $230 Million to Protect Biodiversity

China Pledges $230 Million to Protect Biodiversity

By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer At a UN conference in Kunming, China, President Xi Jinping set aside $230 million to form a fund that preserves biodiversity in developing countries. This announcement was made at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity talks (COP15) which are dedicated to preserving delicate ecosystems and preventing plants and animals […]

Continue Reading 315 words

One Cool Thing: We Have a Winner!

The people have spoken! The portly patriarch of paunch persevered to pulverize the Baron of Beardonkadonk in the final match of #FatBearWeek 2021. 480 Otis can now boast a bevy of bests w/ this fourth 1st place finish. As we celebrate, like a true champ 480 is still chowing down. pic.twitter.com/rLvm7pvGJW — Katmai National Park […]

Continue Reading 207 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.