Supreme Court Hears FOIA Case About Endangered Species

File:Panorama of United States Supreme Court Building at Dusk.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Photo: Joe Ravi, Wikimedia CC

On Monday, which seems like a millennium ago, the newly constituted Supreme Court heard its first environmental case — which was a case about the secrecy of government deliberations.  In this case, those deliberations involve the science behind endangered species protections.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drafted a rule about water discharges and that triggered a requirement that government wildlife agencies look at how that rule might harm endangered species.  Agency scientists then study the question and write a “biological opinion” on what they think the impact of the rule will be.  The Sierra Club sued arguing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires the agencies to make public their biological opinions and even the drafts of them.

Why This Matters:  The case has ramifications beyond endangered species — it goes to scientific integrity and government transparency.  Scientists may need some ability to argue and debate without having all their “deliberations” made public — otherwise, that might “chill” a candid back and forth about the best decision — in this case the most supportable one scientifically.  However, the “biological opinion” is a decision by the issuing agency, and stamping it draft in order to keep it from being made public is not right either.  We need to understand what underpins agency decisions – no matter who is President.

The Supreme Court Argument

Our friends at SCOTSblog did a great job of summarizing the oral argument — and the discussion around how the court might draw a line between making agency draft documents public and keeping them confidential in order to preserve the “deliberative process” of the agency’s scientists and regulation writers.  The biological opinions themselves have been considered “final” documents and thus cannot be withheld from the public under the FOIA.  But in this case, the Justice Department argued that even those were pre-decisional since they pre-dated the EPA final regulation.  However, the Sierra Club effectively explained that the final opinions have legal effect — the “action” agency’s choices are constrained by these scientific assessments of what the biological impact of a rule will be on a species on the brink of extinction.

But what about drafts of those opinions?  That is a trickier question.  It seems clear that just stamping a final opinion “draft” in order to shield it from the public is not right.  But real drafts — that actually predate later version — those might be deserving of legal protection under the sunshine law which protects deliberations so that they will happen freely within the government.  And what if the agency’s scientists are reversed by political interference in a final biological opinion — that might weigh against the deliberative process exemption.

To Go Deeper:  Read the SCOTUSblog coverage here.  And stay tuned for a final decision by July.  We will see how Justice Barrett rules.

Up Next

Record-breaking Year for Manatee Deaths

Record-breaking Year for Manatee Deaths

By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Almost 1,000 of Florida’s manatees have died as of Oct.1 this year, setting a tragic record for the most deaths in a year, with two months left to go. Deaths were largely caused by starvation — the predator-less sea cows typically spend hours a day eating seagrass, but declining […]

Continue Reading 357 words
One Cool Thing: Where’s Walrus?

One Cool Thing: Where’s Walrus?

Do you have a good eye? Are you surprisingly good at Where’s Waldo and like Walruses? If so, we have great opportunity for you! The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is seeking volunteers to help count Atlantic walruses…from space.   Sea ice is retreating fast as global temperatures rise, forcing walruses to crowd on smaller floes […]

Continue Reading 174 words
China Pledges $230 Million to Protect Biodiversity

China Pledges $230 Million to Protect Biodiversity

By Natasha Lasky, ODP Staff Writer At a UN conference in Kunming, China, President Xi Jinping set aside $230 million to form a fund that preserves biodiversity in developing countries. This announcement was made at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity talks (COP15) which are dedicated to preserving delicate ecosystems and preventing plants and animals […]

Continue Reading 315 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.