#scientific integrity
Interview of the Week: Andrew Rosenberg, Union of Concerned Scientists

Interview of the Week: Andrew Rosenberg, Union of Concerned Scientists

Dr. Andrew Rosenberg is the Director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) that is working to stand up for science, and to help scientists and communities work together to find solutions to our common problems. ODP:  Scientists and scientific integrity in the Trump Administration have been severely challenged. […]

Continue Reading 814 words

Directors of NOAA Research and National Weather Service Push Back

The Sharpie-Gate saga continued yesterday when The Washington Post obtained an internal email from the Chief Scientist at NOAA, Craig McLean, who wrote his colleagues that he “is investigating whether the agency’s response to President Trump’s Hurricane Dorian tweets constituted a violation of NOAA policies and ethics.” In addition, the head of the National Weather […]

Continue Reading 549 words
Trump EPA declares that Roundup doesn’t cause cancer, despite thousands of lawsuits

Trump EPA declares that Roundup doesn’t cause cancer, despite thousands of lawsuits

This week the Environmental Protection Agency maintained in a new decision that glyphosate, the active ingredient in the widely used herbicide Roundup, does not cause cancer and is safe for human use. This decision comes despite thousands of lawsuits against the chemical’s manufacturer Monsanto and its parent company Bayer arguing that exposure to Roundup causes […]

Continue Reading 433 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Stay in the know, empower yourself to be a #FriendOfThePlanet, sign up to receive ODP in your inbox each morning!

We Must Stand Up For Science

We Must Stand Up For Science

I am one of many members of Congress who count on them and appreciate their work. I worked closely with this community on a bill I introduced with Congressman Paul Tonko this week on scientific integrity. The Scientific Integrity Act (S.775) would protect government science from political interference. It would make data and findings off-limits for political appointees and managers, and make sure scientists follow careful processes for review.

Continue Reading 603 words