Tear Gas is Not Benign, So Why Are Police Still Using it on Protestors?

Protestors are tear gassed as the police disperse them near the White House on June 1, 2020 as demonstrations against George Floyd's death continue. (Photo: Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images)

Image: Roberto Schmidt/AFP

This past week we’ve seen police brutality protestors around the nation dispersed with tear gas by law enforcement, a tactic that’s been used for protesting crowds for decades. But what is tear gas, and is it benign? The answer is not at all.

Dr. Robert Glatter, an emergency physician in New York City told USA Today that tear gas should be considered a nerve agent in that it doesn’t just irritate cells, but also activates specific pain receptors leading to intense and burning pain on all affected areas as well as long term damage to the body. What’s worse is that tear gas can help the spread of coronavirus

In Hong Kong, where pro-democracy protests have been ongoing the use of tears gas has sparked major concerns from residents about the long term health impacts to people as well as animals and the environment. In fact, police there were urged not to use dogs in enforcement as animals also suffer from the effects of tear gas.

Why This Matters: Tear gas been banned as a method of warfare by the Chemical Weapons Convention yet it is being used on public demonstrators around the world. The NIH even says that there’s not been nearly enough testing on the substance to understand its environmental and human health consequences. Another problem is that tear gas isn’t one substance and it’s difficult to know what’s being used on crowds as the specific mixes, including the non-chemical ingredients, are often proprietary.

And as Axios explained yesterday, in the U.S. not only is it not clear what’s really in tear gas but it’s also difficult to understand which companies are making these toxic chemical compounds and selling them to law enforcement.

What is Tear Gas: As the BBC explained, the chemical compound used in most tear gas canisters is o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile, known as CS, and is often used as a means of crowd control by military and police units to force people to disperse quickly.

  • There are other, stronger chemical structures – one is called CN, which was a precursor of CS. And then there is CR, which is known to be a particularly potent version that is six times more powerful than CS. CR is rarely used and it’s banned in the US because it can cause cancer.
  • Different types of tear gas with different compounds have their own toxicological effects and levels. The effects differ mostly in high dosage, but in lower concentrations they are similar.

Lack of Research: As Truthout explained, there is still little science on the long-term effects of tear gas exposure, the consequences of exposure for children or the elderly, or the ecological impacts. The lack of research, in turn, has provided justification for using tear gas as a so-called “non-lethal” alternative to live ammunition on crowds.

Sven Jordt, a professor at Duke University School of Medicine who has studied tear gas for many years said that “I’m very concerned that the use is dramatically increasing worldwide, while the research is not increasing at all.” Adding that “There’s very little systematic research being supported at this time by the U.S. government.”

What’s worse? Tear gas used in a protest situation amplifies its effects. The strain caused by physical exertion such as running makes someone coming in contact with tear gas more susceptible to more severe symptoms

Up Next

EPA Dismisses Science on Pesticide Chlorpyrifos Citing Lack Of “Raw Data”

EPA Dismisses Science on Pesticide Chlorpyrifos Citing Lack Of “Raw Data”

The Trump Administration announced last week that it has rejected the settled scientific evidence linking the pesticide chlorpyrifos to serious health problems, particularly in children. This pesticide, which is widely used on soybeans, almonds, grapes, and other crops, has been proven to harm children’s neurological development

Why this matters: Under the false flag of transparency, EPA is putting children at greater risk. 

Continue Reading 503 words
Update: Joshua Tree Petition Granted For One Year While Officials Conduct Study

Update: Joshua Tree Petition Granted For One Year While Officials Conduct Study

by Amy Lupica, ODP Contributing Writer On Tuesday, the California Fish and Game Commission voted to accept a petition that will grant the Joshua tree, the famous twisty-limbed yucca plant native to the Mojave desert, endangered species status for one year while the state conducts a study. The plant is now considered a “candidate species” […]

Continue Reading 658 words
Wildfire Smoke Increases COVID-19 Risk for Frontline Communities

Wildfire Smoke Increases COVID-19 Risk for Frontline Communities

by Razi Beresin-Scher and Miro Korenha According to recent reporting from The Hill, atmospheric smoke is exacerbating the toll of the COVID-19 virus in Oregon and California. Smoke inhalation weakens the immune systems of those suffering from asthma and other underlying respiratory conditions, compromising their ability to recover from the virus.  Researchers at the Harvard […]

Continue Reading 584 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.