Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
If you make a contribution of $150 or more, you will become an official “Friend of the Planet” and receive a Friend of the Planet T-shirt or water bottle. You can also submit opinion essays to us for our consideration for posting on our new “Bright Ideas” op-ed page.
On Thursday, the Trump Administration continued its environmental armageddon by changing the way costs and benefits of rules are calculated in favor of polluters and thus fundamentally weakening current regulatory protections from mercury and other toxic metals emitted by oil and coal-fired power plants. As The New York Times explained, “[b]y reducing the positive health effects of regulations on paper and raising their economic costs, the new method could be used to justify loosening restrictions on any pollutant that the fossil fuel industry has deemed too costly to control.”
Why This Matters: The polluters win again – President Trump continues to deliver for his big donors. As thousands of Americans are fighting for their lives due to the malfeasance of the Trump Administration and its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Administration is rolling back another air pollution rule that will endanger tens of thousands more unnecessarily. And this sets a dangerous precedent for reducing the protections other rules provide by putting a fat thumb on the scale for big businesses — particularly the ones that pollute the most.
The Announcement Was Met With Outrage
Former EPA Administrator Carol Browner expressed her anger about the rollback, calling it a “sinister Trojan horse” that “will undermine how the EPA considers science and evaluates economic benefits of regulations in the future…It’s nothing other than a giveaway to big polluters that will be paid for with thousands of lives, especially of those in the most vulnerable communities.”
David Konisky, a professor of public and environmental affairs at Indiana University told The Times, “This is less about mercury than about potentially constraining or handcuffing future efforts by the E.P.A. to regulate air pollution.”
The Adminstration’s “New Math”
When it put the rule in place, the Obama administration calculated the costs of the rule to industry to be between up to $9.6 billion each year to comply with the regulation, but the benefits experienced by society from less pollution would be between $37 billion and $90 billion thanks to the prevention of thousands of premature deaths and lost work days. But, as The Washington Post reports, the cost-benefit rules of the Obama Administration allowed the government to factor into the calculation the additional benefits created by corresponding pollution reductions in soot and other smog-forming pollutants that contribute to asthma and other respiratory problems. The Trump Administration decided that to add in the “co-benefits” to the cost/benefit calculation was using “creative math” to justify overly burdensome regulations.
Why’d They Do It?
Ironically, most of the utility industry was complying with the regulations and did not seek out this relief. But one of the President’s largest campaign contributors, Robert E. Murray, the former chief executive of Murray Energy Corporation, put this rule rollback at the top of his “wish list” that he delivered to the administration right after the president took office. Murray left the company the day it declared bankruptcy last October. The company’s creditors on Tuesday alleged that the company breached its $450 million chapter 11 financing package.
As we expand our understanding of climate change, scientists have begun to focus on the growing role warming temperatures are playing as a potent driver of greater aridity–which is different than drought. As NOAA describes it, drought is “a period of abnormally dry weather sufficiently long enough to cause a serious hydrological imbalance”. Aridity is […]
For many who live near refineries, incinerators, and other heavy industry, lockdowns and shelter in place orders like we have all experienced lately are a far too common occurrence. The New York Times took a closer look at these communities to show why the residents are so vulnerable to the disease.
Why This Matters:Dr. Mustafa Santiago Ali explained to put the COVID deaths into context, “we know more than 100,000 people die prematurely in the U.S. every year because of air pollution.”
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.