Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
China is often criticized for funding fossil fuel power infrastructure beyond its borders, and rightly so: it’s the top financier of overseas power plants, especially coal-fired ones. But they’re not the only ones continuing to finance coal and gas projects overseas.
The US and Japan are a close second and third, enabling gas and coal power in countries like Indonesia, India, Vietnam, and the United Arab Emirates.
Why This Matters: All three countries have climate neutrality targets within their own borders but minimal restrictions on overseas fossil fuel financing. China has no policy on the topic, and while the US and Japan ostensibly have agreed to stop, they are able to fund these projects through bilateral financing. These investments lock in carbon pollution, making it harder for developing nations to switch their energy source to renewables.
“Such fossil fuel infrastructure financing impedes the low carbon energy transition and needs to stop,” Xu Chen, lead author of the study and postgraduate research associate at Princeton University’s Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment, said in a statement.
Drilling in on the Data: While there has been previous analysis of the international development banks who have been slowly shifting their portfolios toward renewable energy, this study is the first to look at how national development finance institutions are funding fossil fuel energy projects.
How much fossil fuel capacity did each country fund? From 2010-2018,
China facilitated 101 GW of energy total. 64% of that capacity comes from fossil fuel plants.
Japan facilitated 95 GW of energy total. 87% of that capacity comes from fossil fuel plants.
China facilitated 47 GW of energy total. 66% of that capacity comes from fossil fuel plants.
Together, the study estimates that the three countries facilitated locking in 24 gigatons of CO2 emissions by 2060.
“If climate targets are to be met, replacing bilateral fossil fuel financing with financing of renewable technologies is crucial,” the study authors write.
This past May, President Biden signed an executive order on climate-related financial risk, a cross-governmental plan that directs federal agencies to identify and mitigate financial risks presented by climate change to Americans, businesses, and the government itself. Progress on this order was made over the weekend when Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced that the Financial Stability […]
Why This Matters: Money talks. Investors are increasingly willing to walk away from deals like oil and gas drilling projects in the Arctic or investments in fossil fuel companies that refuse to change their business models.
American financiers are moving to divest from fossil fuels to help the U.S. reach net-zero carbon emissions, but some state Republicans are fighting back. Fifteen Republican state treasurers are now threatening to pull hundreds of billions of dollars worth of assets from large financial institutions if they move forward decarbonizing their portfolios per a letter they wrote to Climate Envoy John Kerry.
Why This Matters: Banks and financiers have invested billions in destructive environmental practices. Deforestation funded by the world’s largest banks increased in 2020 despite COVID-19.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.