Three Keys to Climate Action, Five Years after Paris

Graphic: Annabel Driussi for Our Daily Planet

By Shyla Raghav, VP of Climate Change, Conservation International

Five years ago this month, after years of tense negotiations, the gavel sounded to announce the adoption of the Paris Agreement. Like many who participated in the negotiations, I was relieved, hopeful, and exhausted. Everyone in the conference room recognized that this was just the first phase in a long journey ahead.

Five years later, that journey has featured both successes and setbacks. We are now entering into a new phase for the agreement, one that must be defined by real, immediate action. Starting this year, the world must rapidly reduce its emissions – and continue to do so with every passing year – if we are to avoid the most severe consequences of climate change. Yesterday’s anniversary summit, with its emphasis on elevating ambition, was definitely a step in the right direction, with many countries increasing their commitments. We anticipate hearing more on a U.S. proposal next month after an anticipated return to the agreement under President-Elect Joe Biden.

Government leadership will be key, but it will take more than that, I believe. It will take centering solutions not just on technology, but also on conserving and restoring nature. As we approach the end of 2020, here are three steps we must take to succeed:

First, Corporations Must Take Concrete Actions

Businesses played a key role in the negotiations leading to the Paris Agreement, and their support was essential to the agreement’s adoption. After the Trump administration announced its plans for withdrawal in 2017, I applauded the corporate leaders who stayed the course on climate action. Today, they must continue to move forward with bold commitments and decisive actions. Otherwise, companies risk pushing their responsibilities onto future generations.

To make a difference, corporate sustainability strategies must now include concrete measures in four areas: reducing carbon emissions and shifting to cleaner energy sources; disclosing climate risks; minimizing the environmental impact of their supply chains; and proactively promoting regenerative practices to keep ecosystems intact and reverse the destruction of nature. Changing our energy sources and decreasing emissions have long been the focus.  But looking at the impacts on the natural world caused by those emissions – and correcting them — should also be a key focus.

Second, We Must Be Innovative —  Not Just Recover — Recreate

Throughout history, pandemics have transformed societies and economies. The Plague of Justinian contributed to the end of the Roman Empire. The Black Death transformed labor practices in Medieval Europe. And yellow fever led to the end of slavery in Haiti. The COVID-19 pandemic demands a similar global reset. As governments around the world commit to massive economic recovery packages, they must not prop up the same practices that led to climate change, environmental degradation, and the spread of the coronavirus.

Instead of reinforcing the status quo, governments should seize this opportunity to create economies that maintain a healthier relationship with nature. In other words, recovery isn’t enough. Now is the time to build something new. Stimulus packages should create green jobs, redirect subsidies away from polluting and environmentally destructive industries, and accelerate a much-needed transition towards renewable energy sources.

In all of these actions, governments must maintain a clear focus on environmental justice. Black and Indigenous communities, as well as other communities of color, have repeatedly and systematically borne the brunt of industrial pollution and land degradation. Governments must correct for these injustices by advancing policies that support frontline communities.

Third, We Must Invest in Nature Now

Projects to protect and restore ecosystems are some of the most effective and immediately available solutions to fight climate change. These investments help prevent deforestation – the second largest cause of climate change — and deliver benefits faster than any technology that we can create. In fact, protecting and restoring tropical forests and mangroves can provide at least 30 percent of mitigation action needed to avoid the worst climate scenarios by 2030. These ecosystems also boost biodiversity, prevent soil erosion, and create sustainable livelihoods for local communities – making them uniquely good for both people and the planet. Bottom line: investing in nature is an enormous opportunity to couple commitments with immediate action.

The Future We Want to Create

Five years after the Paris Agreement, in the midst of a devastating pandemic, we have a choice about the economy and the future we want to create. President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris have said that they intend to re-enter the Paris Agreement, which has renewed the prospect of American leadership on climate change. It’s clear that the decisions their administration makes will be a critical factor in propelling global climate action forward. Their commitment to conserving 30% of the U.S. by 2030 is bold and new, and I applaud it.  I hope that they will extend that commitment to leading the world to achieve it as well.  If we can reach that #30×30 target globally, we will heal our environment and mitigate climate change at the same time.  The U.S. is indispensable to achieving this goal globally as well.

Finally, acting on climate change is not just the government’s responsibility. Our best chance of avoiding climate catastrophe is for everyone –corporations, governments, and communities – to reject complacency and pursue immediate action. If we do this now, we can ensure that the path forward creates a more sustainable future and a more stable climate.

 

Up Next

Biden’s Speech Calls on Americans to Listen to Our Planet’s Cries

Biden’s Speech Calls on Americans to Listen to Our Planet’s Cries

Yesterday, in his inaugural address, President Biden asked the nation to come together “join forces, stop the shouting and lower the temperature” in an effort to address the crises before us. He asked for a baseline of reality and a true acknowledgment for the challenges ahead, saying that: Every disagreement doesn’t have to be a […]

Continue Reading 214 words
Conspiracy Theorists Spun a Web of Disinformation, from Election Fraud to Climate Change

Conspiracy Theorists Spun a Web of Disinformation, from Election Fraud to Climate Change

The January 6th insurrection at the Capitol was the culmination of years of disinformation, conspiracy theories, and false narratives pushed by the GOP, the Trump administration, white supremacists, and the far-right — but these tactics are not a surprise to those who work in the climate movement. Indeed, experts like John Schwartz, a science writer for The New York Times, the lies and rhetoric that fueled the riots felt all too familiar. 

Why This Matters:  The fossil fuel industry employed the big tobacco disinformation playbook, a strategy that only became more effective with the onset of the internet age.

Continue Reading 513 words
Supreme Court Could Determine the Future of Climate Lawsuits

Supreme Court Could Determine the Future of Climate Lawsuits

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on this issue in BP Plc v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, which could determine whether or not oil companies are held accountable for climate change damages to cities and states.

Why This Matters: If SCOTUS rules in favor of BP, future climate litigation will likely be fought in federal courts, which experts say are “less responsive to expansive legal theories,”  and thus less likely to rule in favor of these innovative new climate cases based on state law. Whoever wins this case will have a leg up in future climate litigation.  

 

Continue Reading 633 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.