Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Last Friday the state of California (along with 22 other states and the District of Columbia) filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration for its attempt to revoke the state’s waiver to set more stringent car emissions standards than that of the federal government (an authority granted to the state through the Clean Air Act of 1970). Now, as WTOP reported, yesterday a group of concerned beekeepers also filed a suit against the EPA over its July decision to expand the use of sulfoxaflor, an insecticide that’s known to harm bees and other pollinators.
CNN reported that, “The Pollinator Stewardship Council, the American Beekeeper Federation and beekeeper Jeff Anderson, who are represented by Earthjustice, have asked the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to review the EPA’s decision earlier this summer to rollback several restrictions around the pesticide sulfoxaflor, which were put in place under the Obama administration over concerns it might be contributing to plummeting bee populations.”
The Background: The Fence Post reported in July that sulfoxaflor is used to target pests such as sugarcane aphids and tarnished plant bugs, also known as lygus. When the EPA’s decision was announced in July, Alexandra Dapolito Dunn, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, explained to the press that EPA had first approved the use of sulfoxaflor in 2013, but that in 2016, following a 2015 decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacating the registration of sulfoxaflor citing inadequate data on the effects on bees, EPA reevaluated the data and approved registrations that did not include crops that attract bees.
Is Sulfoxaflor Safe? Sierra Magazine noted that sulfoxaflor was initially developed by Dow Chemical in 2010 and was marketed as a safer alternative to neonicotinoids, a widely used class of pesticide. Groups like the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), an environmental legal advocacy group, maintain that the insecticide is not safe for pollinators facing environmental stresses. Additionally,a paper published in Nature in 2018 found that bee colonies exposed to sulfoxaflor experienced significant difficulty reproducing and had fewer than half the number of offspring as unexposed colonies.
Why This Matters: The Center for Biological Diversity explained and that the EPA is routinely misusing the ‘emergency’ process to get sulfoxaflor approved (as it did in its July decision) because it’s too toxic to make it through normal pesticide reviews. And in the case of California, the Trump Administration is treading on thin legal ice by revoking California’s Clean Air Act Waiver. California has been granted 100 waivers since 1970. Many view Trump’s moves as erratic and a way to “stick it” to constituencies that did not vote for him. Whether that’s the case or not, the health of Americans and the vitality of our food supply (that requires pollinators) will be put in jeopardy with these power plays by the Trump EPA and Department of Transportation.
Go Deeper: Read this interview with former Obama EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy where she discusses youth climate protests and her response to Trump environmental regulatory rollbacks.
Go Even Deeper: At a campaign stop yesterday, Mayor Pete Buttigieg had a honeybee land on his tie. He took off his tie and had the lost bee taken outside to pollinate Iowa.
It’s spring in Paris, they are still struggling with COVID, and yet thousands of demonstrators took to the streets in Paris and numerous other French cities to protest climate change. The French legislature is considering a law to impose tougher measures to combat climate change, but many believe the proposals are not sufficient and so they staged marches in Nancy, Toulouse, Rennes, Lyon, Grenoble, as seen in social media posts.
Why This Matters: Because of the Paris Agreement, France is associated with climate change progress.
As California’s drought conditions are worsening, Nestle is pumping millions of gallons of water from the San Bernardino forest. State water officials have drafted a cease-and-desist order to force the company to stop overpumping from Strawberry Creek, which provides drinking water for about 750,000 people.
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer In the Biden administration’s first 100 days, the climate crisis and environmental issues have been at the forefront of the administration’s agenda. As Environment America writes in their progress report, “despite the need to rebuild many federal agencies and tackle the COVID-19 crisis, the Biden administration has already taken […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.