Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
After its first proposed sale was blocked by a federal judge, the Trump Administration proposed on Friday a second timber sale in the pristine Tongass National Forest in Alaska, The Hill reported. The sale would cover 6000 acres, including 5000 acres of old-growth trees and the proposal also includes road-building activities. The Tongass National Forest is one of the largest intact old-growth forests in the Americas and is an important carbon sink. In July, Inside Climate News reported that nine native Alaska tribes filed a petition calling on the Agriculture Department to halt the removal of protections for the Forest, which the tribes say is vital to their livelihoods.
Why This Matters: The Tongass is the largest national forest and one of the most important forests in the world (as the Ag Department itself says – watch the video). It contains some of the last surviving old-growth temperate rainforests in North America and is home to numerous species of endangered wildlife and is very important to several native tribes. As the Tlingit tribal members said last fall, “If you destroy the Tongass Forest if you destroy the ecosystem, the salmon, the rivers, the trees, you also are committing cultural genocide against indigenous people because they are the land the land is them.”
The Administration’s Alaska Jobs Push
The Agriculture Department’s proposal justified the sale as needed to “contribute jobs and labor income in local and regional communities in the timber and tourism sectors, contribute to improved terrestrial and aquatic conditions, support access to subsistence resources, and provide safe access to Forest users.” The harvest would occur on Revillagigedo Island, which is part of the national forest. This is a different timber harvesting proposal from one that a judge blocked earlier this year because, according to The Hill, the Forest Service’s environmental analysis for a sale on Prince of Wales Island had “serious shortcomings.”
The Tribes’ Claims To Hunting And Fishing Rights
The Tribes argued in their petition that “One of our sovereign Tribes’ highest priorities is to protect the traditional and customary hunting, fishing, and gathering areas within our traditional tribal territory. Our customary and traditional uses cannot be protected when, ignoring our input and sovereign interests, road construction, logging, mining, mineral leasing, and other large-scale industrial development, which has already devastated large expanses of the forest, is permitted to farther impact the Tongass National Forest (“Tongass”).” They requested that the Trump Administration “to commence a rulemaking process, in collaboration with the Tribes of Southeast Alaska, to create a Traditional Homelands Conservation Rule that protects the traditional and customary uses and areas of the Tlingit, Haida, and Tsimshian peoples in the Tongass National Forest.” That request was apparently ignored.
As wildfires across the West continue to rage, President Trump has continued to push the message that the cause of the fires is solely due to poor forest management. It’s not a new message for Republicans, but science unequivocally points to the ways in which climate change is supercharging wildfires. Ezra Romero, an environmental reporter […]
by Julia Fine, ODP Contributing Writer As Stefanie Glinski reported for the Thomson Reuters Foundation this week, large-scale deforestation in Afghanistan, due primarily to the past 40 years of war, has advanced flooding in the country (as trees prevent soil erosion and serve as a buffer against flooding). According to Glinski, “Trees have long been […]
Why This Matters: The Trump team seems to be speeding up their desperate efforts to help fossil fuels as the first (and hopefully only) term nears an end. There is no economic or national security rationale for this.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.