Trump Administration Minimizes Benefits of Carbon Regulation and Cuts NEPA Reviews

Photo: projectnepa.org via Friends of the Mississippi River

A government watchdog report issued yesterday found that the Trump administration has been “systematically underestimating the damage caused by carbon pollution, slashing figures used under the Obama administration to weigh the impacts” of regulations to curb emissions, according to The Hill And late yesterday, The Washington Post reported that Trump will finalize and implement his proposal to fundamentally weaken the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a bedrock environmental law, to minimize the review of the pollution and other environmental impacts caused by the government building or even permitting of highways, pipelines, military operations, and other major actions that create environmental harms and risks.

Why This Matters: Why This Matters:  These changes will make it easier to relax rules on carbon pollution and will result in more damaging environmental projects undertaken by the government. Cost/benefit analysis had long been a tool used to block environmental health and safety measures because the costs to industry generally were easy to calculate while the benefits were not always quantifiable.  But increasingly we can calculate the huge benefits of these environmental protections in terms of avoided health care costs and lost workdays, etc.  So now the Trump Administration is “cooking the books” in order to further its anti-environmental agenda. 

NEPA Reviews Expected to be Severely Limited Going Forward

The Trump Administration first proposed to gut the NEPA’s requirement for environmental reviews back in January – and if the final version mirrors the initial proposal, it would mean that major new U.S. projects like highways and pipelines will no longer require federal reviews of their environmental climate impact.  As we reported at the time, it would also essentially allow private parties hired by the government to build highways or pipelines to do a self-assessment to determine whether an analysis of the environmental impacts is needed at all, and it would limit the scope of projects that would trigger stringent environmental reviews called environmental impact studies, as well as expand the number of project categories that can be excluded from NEPA reviews altogether.

Cutting Benefits By The Numbers

The report comes from the General Accounting Office, which undertook this review at the request of numerous Democratic Members of Congress after the White House in 2017 disbanded the group of federal agencies that determined what assumptions to use in making these important calculations in order to direct the change in policy by Executive Order without further discussion.  What changed?  GAO found that when the Obama Administration did the calculations they had certain assumptions that were based on Office of Management and Budget guidelines, but the Trump Administration used 2 different key assumptions and as a result, they estimated the benefits to be 7 times lower than the Obama Administration in constant dollars.  Both the prior and current estimates were calculated using the same economic models.  Trump, however, used “(1) domestic rather than global climate change damages (see table) and (2) different discount rates (3 and 7 percent rather than 2.5, 3, and 5 percent).”

 

Up Next

California Bill Aims to Clarify Recycling Symbols

California Bill Aims to Clarify Recycling Symbols


By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Those three arrows in a triangle are an easy shorthand for recyclables, but there’s one problem:  just because the symbol is printed on a product, doesn’t necessarily mean the item is recyclable. It simply informs consumers of the type of plastic used based on the number within the arrows. […]

Continue Reading 391 words
One Cool Thing: Think Outside the Sauce

One Cool Thing: Think Outside the Sauce

“Recycling just got saucy.” Taco Bell has announced that it’s teaming up with recycling firm TerraCycle to keep its iconic sauce packets out of landfills. The company says that more than 8 billion of their spicy sauce packets end up in landfills each year, but with this new partnership, those friendly packets can become something […]

Continue Reading 139 words
One Cool Thing: Net-Zero Sports

One Cool Thing: Net-Zero Sports

Sky Sports, Tottenham Hotspur Football Club, the Premier League, and COP26 have teamed up to put on the world’s first major net-zero football game (or Soccer game as it’s called in the US). #GameZero, featuring Tottenham vs. Chelsea, will be a showcase of how fans, teams, and broadcasters can move toward a net-zero future. The […]

Continue Reading 131 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.