Trump Seeks Votes in Nevada, Backtracks Previous Support of Yucca Mountain Nuclear Storage

Yucca Mountain proposed nuclear dump site. Image: John Locher

Nevada’s Yucca Mountain has been designated as a nuclear waste storage site for nearly 30 years. It’s largely been a political football with lawmakers trying to woo concerned Nevada voters with promises to avoid storing radioactive material at the site. Now, as Politico reported, “President Donald Trump is seeking to woo Nevada voters by abandoning the GOP’s decades of support for storing the nation’s nuclear waste under a mountain northwest of Las Vegas — a move that could drag the White House into an unsolvable political stalemate.”

In a tweet earlier this month, President Trump made a sudden insinuation that his administration would not support storing waste at Yucca Mountain despite his previous desire to restart the program.

The History: As E&E News explained, Congress in 1987 designated the federally owned site in southern Nevada to host the nation’s sole, indefinite repository for high-level nuclear waste from defense and power generation uses.

  • But opposition from Nevada, environmentalists, Obama and others has held it up. The state argues it had no say in Congress’ picking the site and that it does not want to deal with potential radioactive incidents or leakage.

Throughout the 2000s and 2010s Nevada lawmakers took a firm stance against storage at Yucca Mountain in order to align with the will of voters. Mostly it was former Nevada Senator Harry Reid and after his retirement, Senator Dean Heller took the lead in an effort to save his Senate seat–which he ultimately lost. Overall, however, Republicans have largely been in favor of making Yucca Mountain a nuclear storage site.

Trump’s Calculation: There’s no clear political payoff for Trump in reversing his previous decision to store nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain. As Politico explained, “once again, Trump could face political risks by intervening in a politically charged, no-win energy quagmire. Some lawmakers also fear that Trump is undermining their efforts to work out a compromise in which some states agree to host a small number of interim waste storage sites while the search for a long-term solution continues.”

Why This Matters: This is one of the biggest problems with nuclear energy: we currently don’t have many options for storing spent fuel rods that are still radioactive. We’ve seen this in Germany as well after it vowed to shut down its nuclear plants it has struggled to dispose of the waste. As the LA Times explained, “storing spent fuel at an operating plant with staff and technology on hand can cost $300,000 a year. The price for a closed facility: more than $8 million, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute.” No one wants nuclear waste in their backyard yet the United States does have to do something with its supply. What to do at Yucca Mountain has been at a stalemate for years, it’s likely that Trump’s pledge is merely a campaign stunt but it will be worth watching how far he’s willing to go to uphold it.


Up Next

One Cool Thing: Electric Rentals

One Cool Thing: Electric Rentals

As more people around the nation are taking to the roads and skies for their vaccinated vacations, one car rental company is making it easier for folks to not only travel in style, but travel green. Hertz has announced that it will be purchasing 100,000 Tesla electric vehicles by the end of 2022 alongside an […]

Continue Reading 152 words
Climate Change-Fueled Weather Increasing Power Outages

Climate Change-Fueled Weather Increasing Power Outages

By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Last year, the average American household experienced eight hours without power, as storms hammered electrical systems built with less erratic climate conditions in mind. That average outage time is double what it was five years ago. But only looking at the average obscures the experience of people who lived […]

Continue Reading 421 words

We Talk Hot FERC Summer with Rep. Sean Casten

We sat down with Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) to talk about the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) or “Hot FERC Summer,” as we like to call it. According to Rep. Casten, though FERC is often thought of as “a sleepy agency that is, frankly, kind of nerdy” — it can be a powerful force to […]

Continue Reading 151 words

Want the planet in your inbox?

Subscribe to the email that top lawmakers, renowned scientists, and thousands of concerned citizens turn to each morning for the latest environmental news and analysis.