Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
In striking down the plan, the court affirmed that the Clean Air Act allows the EPA to create regulations for the entire power sector — not just at the pollution-emitting plants, as the rule proposed. On the last day of the Trump administration, the ruling caps off four years of attempted environmental rollbacks from the agency meant to protect it.
Why this Matters: The decision leaves the Biden administration with a clean slate to take on climate change, including regulating power plant emissions. By voiding the Trump EPA’s rule, the incoming administration can get right to work instead of spending time and energy on a legal battle to undo damage. The power sector is the second-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the US, so acting on climate change means changing how the country generates energy.
Shifting away from polluting energy sources is also good for public health: according to an EPA analysis, if the Trump rule went into effect, it would have caused as many as 1,400 additional deaths a year by the end of the decade.
“The real win here is that the Trump administration failed to tie the Biden team’s hands,” Jody Freeman, a professor of environmental law at Harvard University told the New York Times. “They wanted to lock in a narrow legal interpretation and make it impossible for a new administration to set ambitious standards for power plants. That was their whole strategy. And it went down to spectacular defeat.”
What Happened to the Clean Power Plan: The Trump administration had to create their new, industry-friendly rule in the first place because they repealed former President Obama’s Clean Power Plan. That plan never went into effect: it was held up in courts after Republican state attorneys general and industry representatives sued, and the Supreme Court wouldn’t allow it to go into effect until those rulings were handed down. The plan emerged after the Paris agreement and was part of the US plan to meet emission targets set back in 2015.
Scaling production of EVs in the U.S. will require a ramp-up in domestic battery production. Now there’s good news on that front. A battery factory in Georgia can move forward after LG Energy Solution and SK Innovation (South Korean companies), two of the world’s biggest electric vehicle battery manufacturers, settled a dispute.
Why This Matters: The dispute threatened U.S. production of EVs. SK has contracts to produce batteries for electric Ford F-150 pickup trucks and Volkswagen SUVs.
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer Right now, 95% of American public school buses run on diesel fuel, but that could soon change thanks to part of the Biden administration’s massive infrastructure proposal. The new Clean Buses for Kids Program would electrify at least 20% of the country’s iconic yellow school bus fleet. It would […]
by Amy Lupica, ODP Staff Writer In February, the governors of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware voted unanimously to ban fracking in the Delaware River Basin, but Republican-led lawsuits are seeking to stop this action. The ban prevented the natural gas industry from blasting up to 4,000 wells in the basin, serving a blow to the […]
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.