Please invest in Our Daily Planet today, by making a one time or monthly contribution.
We do not charge our readers a subscription fee for our content. We want to continue to grow our readership, particularly among millennials and public servants. Voluntary contributions from readers will help us employ interns and freelance journalists, expand our content, and reach a larger audience.
Why This Matters: As the 2020 election nears, Trump faces speculation that all the money and effort he put into coal, wasn’t invested in good faith. Some believe that the direct interventions into coal and power plants like the Navajo Generating Station in Arizona were nothing more than an elaborate PR campaign that failed. Trump now has lost the vote of many miners and plant workers. Alvin Long, a lifelong Republican who worked as a miner for 30 years said, “We really thought we had a chance to keep it going, when we voted for Trump. But I don’t care to listen to him anymore. All of his promises went down the drain.”
The Trump Administration’s Failure To Turn The Tide On Coal
As the Times summed it up: “Since Mr. Trump was inaugurated, 145 coal-burning units at 75 power plants have been idled, eliminating 15 percent of the nation’s coal-generated capacity, enough to power about 30 million homes.” In this failed effort to save the industry, Trump rolled back some of the most important environmental regulations on the books. For example, Trump’s rollback of the Obama Era Clean Power Act didn’t benefit the coal industry the way he said it would. At the same time, the Trump administration cut funding for many federal works and job training programs. Coal workers laid off from mines and plants, or those whose workplaces closed entirely were abandoned by the Administration, with few federal resources for finding new jobs.
In regions like Arizona, Indigenous communities who had worked in the coal industry for generations were especially damaged, despite being promised that they would be saved. Trump’s inability to deliver cost him the support of many Indigenous mining communities, who have since embraced plans to transition to clean energy. Navajo National Council Speaker, Seth Damon, explained, “Our people, our sovereignty and our right to self-determination predate the first coal seam found on Navajo, and we will endure and thrive together.”
Some may consider this a win for the environment and environmental groups, but it’s a pyrrhic victory. Three years of rollbacks and layoffs have left climate change unchecked and communities in the lurch. Trump’s real failure lies in making such unreasonable, PR motivated promises in the first place. Coal communities already knew that the industry was on its last legs. “You really can’t change what was already in motion,” said former miner Bruce Summers.
For many communities, those benefits seem attractive and practical. However, renewable energy production alone may struggle to replace all of the coal jobs lost. About 62% of coal mining regions in the U.S. are suitable for solar farming. The new industry would be able to replace about two-thirds of the jobs formerly provided by mines and power plants, but workers like Ernest J. Whitehorse, whose brother and son also worked in coal, have hope. “We will persevere, survive, like our forefathers did,” he said.
To Go Deeper: Read the whole story with fantastic visuals here.
by Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer In the United States, there’s a growing need to scale up high-speed broadband and clean energy infrastructure. A new housing initiative in New York City will take on both with a single project: setting buildings up for solar power, then using the energy cost savings to bring high-speed internet […]
By Ashira Morris, ODP Staff Writer This week, Poland announced it will close the coal-fired Belchatow power plant by the end of 2036. The country’s national energy group opted not to develop an open-pit coal mine to power the plant after deciding it would not make financial sense. The decision comes as Poland’s Lodz region […]
Thousands of protesters gathered near the headwaters of the Mississippi River from around the country, including actresses Jane Fonda and Patricia Arquette, in an attempt to disrupt the construction of a major pipeline through northern Minnesota, the Duluth Tribune reported.
Why This Matters: The Line 3 pipeline, at a cost of $4B, will carry hundreds of thousands of barrels of dirty Canadian tar-sands oil through the U.S. across at least 200 bodies of water and sensitive watersheds.
Our Daily Planet is your daily dose of the stories shaping our world and the ways that you can take action. From the climate crisis to the protection of biodiversity, if these issues matter to you then please subscribe & stay informed!
Your privacy is Important! We promise never to use your email address to send you spam or advertisements.